Actual Law Suits – On COVID-19 and Vaccines Crimes – January 3, 2022

7 Lawsuits Challenging COVID Vaccine Mandates for U.S. Military Members

Thousands of military members face dishonorable discharge, court-martial and loss of retirement benefits for refusing COVID vaccine mandates.

Lawyers expose alleged COVID-19 fraud and vaccine danger

Jan. 3, 2022 -

A long-awaited peer-reviewed report by the Berlin-based Corona Investigation Committee has just been released alleging what many have feared, that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned, the virus man-made, with the aim to funnel people towards taking an experimental and potentially deadly vaccine.

German Attorney Reiner Fuellmich published a video on 15 September on behalf of the group of lawyers and medical experts on the Corona Investigation Committee, set up in July 2020, that has spent over a year investigating the origins of the pandemic, the restrictions put in place, and the vaccine rollout.



Months of investigations, research and interviews by the Attorney Fuellmich’s committee put forward the allegation that the “official COVID-19 narrative” is a lie and the people have been criminally misled to the point where they are eagerly lining up for an experimental vaccine that has a high probability of injuring or killing the recipient.

In his 40-minute video released on 15 September to announce the findings, Dr Fuellmich walks through the results of the Corona Investigation Committee’s work.

As he notes, this narrative has never been about health.

A number of core allegations stand out that are arguably startling in their implications concerning how governments have handled COVID-19 and the restrictions and mandates they are putting in place.



As Dr Fuellmich explains in reading out the findings of the committee’s report, “governments and mainstream media have deliberately spread panic. There are several leaked documents from interior ministries in many countries that prove this targeted fear-mongering.”

This has been planned and “war-gamed” over more than a decade as seen in a number of reports and the pandemic simulation exercise of Event 201 held in New York, USA, in October 2019, just prior to the emergence of a novel virus in Wuhan, China. As the report notes, COVID-19 is man-made and may have accidently or deliberately released in China to spark the crisis.

Over the last year and a half, governments have been “continuously blasting out the danger” in a propaganda push, using the PCR Test as the monitor of the SARS-CoV-2 virus “cases” around the world.

But, as over 20 scientists have revealed to the committee, the PCR Test invented in haste in January 2020 by German virologist Professor Doctor Christian Drosten has no ability to detect an infection, and produces a high percentage of “false positives”. This claim that the test is “not fit for purpose” in looking for viruses is also backed up by the late Dr Kary Mullis, who helped invent it.

Governments and health authorities around the world have been using a test that does not test whether a person has COVID-19 or not. As the committee’s report explains - reiterating the warnings of Dr Mullis - if the test is run at too high a cycle threshold, over 90 percent of the results will provide false positives.

“Anything will test positive at a high cycle threshold,” warns Dr Mullis in a video discussing the issue, prior to his death.

What this means is that anything over the 24-cycle threshold it likely to provide a false positive, according to the committee’s report. Yet the PCT Test has been typically run at as high as 40 or 45 cycles, ensuring a high percentage of false positives.

Even the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has admitted the failings of the PCR Test, calling in January 2021 for health authorities to reduce the cycle threshold being used – up to then 40-45 cycles. In August, the CDC announced the use of the PCR Test would end in December 2021.

Yet most health authorities around the world continue to use the test at a high threshold, typically testing seemingly healthy people with no symptoms.

As Dr Fuellmich explains, the failure of the PCR Test to identify SARS-CoV-2 means the COVID-19 pandemic numbers – both COVID-19 “cases” and deaths – are a sham. This is not to suggest there is no virus or pathogen infecting and killing people, particularly a problem for those who do not get early treatment. But what it does suggest is the case and death numbers are heavily inflated.

Although the official register of COVID-19 deaths worldwide is now at over 4 million, this may be a grossly inflated figure, according to the report.

A court of appeal in Portugal and an administrative court in Austria have both ruled that the PCR Test is not approved for diagnostic purposes. At the same time, governments around the world have failed to prove the actual existence of SARS-CoV-2 when challenged in Freedom of Information requests.

The failure of the PCR Test indicates that the majority of people labelled COVID-19 may have died from other conditions and diseases – a substantial proportion of whom may have been misdiagnosed and wrongly treated – a scandal in itself.

Muddying the water, many health authorities label COVID-19 deaths as a death “with COVID-19” rather than a death “from COVID-19”. In addition, in several countries including the USA and UK, health professionals and hospitals are financially incentivized to label a patient with COVID-19, and an atmosphere of fear pervades many hospitals preventing doctors and nurses speaking out both about the treatment of COVID-19 patients and the rising number of patients with vaccine adverse events reactions.

In simple terms, while there is a health threat that needs to be taken seriously, the real numbers of COVID-19 cases and deaths could be far smaller than the official figures indicating that according to a correct interpretation of the term, there is no pandemic. more on this from the source

Biden Sued By Air Force Officers Who Compare Vaccine Rule to Death Sentence

Oct. 1/2021 - President Biden's vaccine mandate is being challenged in a lawsuit filed by four active-duty US Air Force officers, a Secret Service agent, a Border Patrol agent, and four other federal employees or contractors. The lawsuit claimed that "convicted serial killers who have been sentenced to death receive more respect" than citizens who are required to take vaccines.

The lawsuit alleges that the vaccine mandate forces service members, federal employees, and federal employees to "inject themselves with: (1) a non-FDA approved product; (2) against their will; and (3) without informed consent." Plaintiffs seek a ruling that the vaccine mandates issued by Biden and the Department of Defense "violate the Fifth Amendment's guarantee of substantive due process" and "the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment." (The Pfizer vaccine does have full FDA approval.)

Plaintiffs also claim the mandate violates the Free Exercise and Establishment clauses of the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and other US laws including "Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against Plaintiffs and service members, federal employees, and federal contractors on the basis of their religion or disability." Biden's order does allow exceptions for medical or religious reasons but exemptions reportedly may be difficult to obtain.


Biden and DOD Chief Named As Defendants

The lawsuit names Biden and Department of Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin as defendants, claiming that "our President's abject derelict [sic] of duty and callous disregard for the laws of this nation have compelled this action." The suit continued:

Americans have remained idle for far too long as our nation's elected officials continue to satisfy their voracious appetites for power while neglecting to uphold and defend the Constitution and preserve the values upon which this nation was founded. Indeed, the forty-seven (47) year subjugation to our Commander-in-Chief's vapid political career our nation has endured leaves little remain [sic] uncertain–with more power, comes greater destitution.

This action seeks redress from Executive Order No.'s 14042 and 14043 (collectively, "Executive Orders") issued by President Biden on September 9, 2021, and an order ("DoD Order") issued by Department of Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin (collectively, Vaccine Mandates") and the unlawful, manipulative, coercive, and deceptive tactics Defendants have employed and continue to employ to facilitate the mass vaccination of all active-duty service members, federal contractors, and federal employees. source