"The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil is that Good Men Do Nothing" - John Stuart Mill
February 2014
Divulging the dark forces within the White House. This includes various agencies in US government and human sacrifices.
The part of government you can see are the puppets, the part you do not see is the shadow government - these are satanic forces who are in control.
An American economist nominated for the Nobel peace prize has called for the head of the World Health Organisation to be prosecuted for genocide over his alleged involvement in directing Ethiopia’s security forces.
The head of the World Health Organization has been accused of backing rebels with weapons and lobbying against the national government as Ethiopia descends towards civil war.
No. Term limits are term limits. FDR used WW2 as a campaign position for each of his 4 terms. When the people saw that the Presidency could become a tyranny, they passed the 22nd Amendment. This set the presidential term limit at 2 terms. The only exception to this is if you are a VP and the President dies or resigns. If this happens later than 2 years into the term, you may run for the presidency twice.
The government is set up in a way that we could transition power during a war. Generals do not change when the President does, so our wartime strategy wouldn’t change.
William Scott Ritter Jr. (born July 15, 1961) is a former United States Marine Corps intelligence officer who served with the United Nations implementing arms control treaties, with General Norman Schwarzkopf in the Persian Gulf during Operation Desert Storm, and in Iraq, overseeing the disarmament of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), as a United Nations weapons inspector, from 1991 to 1998. He later became a critic of United States foreign policy in the Middle East.
Ritter resigned from the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) on August 26, 1998. He had said that the Commission was undermined by infiltration from the CIA and lack of support from Washington and the UN Security Council. At the time of his resignation, he stated the international community was not assertive enough in disarming Saddam Hussein, who he said was obstructing the inspections.[1][2][3] In 2000, Ritter stated that Iraq possessed no significant WMD capabilities. The New York Times reported that Ritter was “the loudest and most credible skeptic of the Bush administration‘s contention that Hussein was hiding weapons of mass destruction.”[2]
WHEN MATTHEW WARD connected telepathically with his mother Suzanne almost 14 years after he died at age 17 in 1980, he told her about their soul level agreement: She was to prepare for publication transmissions from him and many other off-planet sources. Their information is to enlighten, encourage and guide us along Earth’s ascension pathway during this unprecedented time in the universe.
Matthew’s mother Suzanne
This is a very hard choice, but we think the price is worth it.
John Pilger, Squeezed to Death, Guardian, March 4, 2000
In the 20-year-long Afghanistan war, the US has committed horrible war crimes in the country. But Washington and the Pentagon usually refuse to acknowledge them, and try to cover up the truth. It also shields criminals and deals with them leniently. This is done even when the evidence of wrongdoing is staring them in the face. The US also imposed sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC), which started an investigation into US war atrocities in Afghanistan. Washington has shown zero sincerity to reflect upon the crimes it committed against the Afghan people.
In November 2020, a war crimes inquiry found that there was “credible information” to prove that the Australian Special Forces in Afghanistan had unlawfully killed 39 civilians and detainees and cruelly treated two persons. This sparked global outrage. The Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission later called on other nations, especially the US and the UK, to also open inquiries to investigate possible unlawful killings by their forces in Afghanistan. Neither the US nor the UK has made moves in this direction. But it’s widely believed that if a systematic investigation is carried out into US forces, the results would be more appalling and horrible.
The Costs of War project by Brown University estimates that over 46,000 Afghan civilians lost their lives during the longest war in US history. The errant drone strike on August 29 wasn’t the first time Afghan civilians have been killed in drone strikes under the broad banner of the war on terror. Data published in May by Action on Armed Violence (AOAV), a London-based charity, showed that 3,977 casualties were caused by US-led airstrikes between 2016 and 2020. Among them, 1,598 were children. ref
In 2010, it was also reported that 12 American soldiers based in Kandahar province in southern Afghanistan formed a secret “kill team” that allegedly blew up and shot Afghan civilians at random and collected their fingers as trophies.
Besides civilian killings, there are also many allegations over the US forces’ torture, mistreatment and killings of prisoners in Afghanistan. In 2016, in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed more than a decade ago by the American Civil Liberties Union, the US Defense Department had to release nearly 200 photographs related to prisoner abuse at US military facilities in Iraq and Afghanistan. The photos were a part of a larger set of 2,000.
If the Russian military enters Ukrainian territory, it will be for purposes of liberation of the Ukrainian people from their present conquerors. The liberation will be first in the Donbas region marked by Russian humanitarian aid, with some help to rebuild the Ukrainian infrastructure and economy which the Empire has destroyed.
Russia is committed to defend Russian people in the Donbas of Ukraine but has no desire to incorporate Ukraine into the Russian Federation.
If the question is formulated, “Was the Soviet Union an enemy of the US?”, then the answer would be yes. But there is no more Soviet Union, which Reagan accurately labeled “the Evil Empire,” with its expansionist military aggression.
Russian president Putin has come under tremendous criticism in his own country for being conciliatory to the US in his public addresses, referencing the US as “colleagues and partners.”
Putin, along with his foreign minister Sergei Lavrov, has always resorted to dialogue and cooperation rather than coercive military action, “foreign aid” bribes, or meddling in the internal affairs of other nations. When dealing with the Empire and NATO, the foreign policy of Russia toward Ukraine has been strictly defensive. Their time is running out. Just as the United States in the early ‘60s did not want Russian nukes in Cuba, so too Russia does not want NATO military bases and missiles in the Ukraine.
When one examines “just the facts,” what we see is Russia’s unbelievable forbearance in the face of ceaseless aggression of the Empire and the non-stop agitation of the Western propaganda machine.
Putin is a European Russian. Out of a population of 144 million people, fully 111 million live west of the Ural Mountains in the continent of Europe. In religion and culture, Putin is much more European than Asian. Yet he is demonized by the West and assailed with constant lies.
In Putin’s last four presidential elections from 2000–2018, he had vote margins over his closest competitor of 23.9%, 58.1%, 46.2%, and 64.9%. What Western politician could ever have this level of admiration and respect from his people as Putin does?
Putin was secretly baptized as an infant in 1952 by his mother at an underground Orthodox Church ceremony. He identifies himself as a Russian Orthodox Christian and often attends Sunday services in Moscow. Is Putin’s faith genuine? That’s between him and God. What matters most to Russia’s people is Putin’s unwavering support of the church. He is very close to and supportive of the Russian Orthodox Church and has been instrumental in renewing Russia’s historic “symphonia” relationship between church and state. In America, the government attacks the church. In Russia, church and state work together to advance a Christian culture. The Russians know without Trinitarian Orthodoxy there is no Russia. Their 1,000-year Christian faith is their foundation.
George Orwell’s famous dystopian novel 1984 had its “two minutes of hate” where the people’s minds were conditioned to oppose anything the ruling party wanted them to oppose. Putin is the Empire’s new Emmanuel Goldstein.
In reality, Putin will go down in Russian history as one of its greatest princes if not the greatest. In miraculous fashion, he has decoupled Russia from the Western banking oligarchs, severed the Russian economy from Western parasites, restored Russian defenses, and shown the nation the path to full recovery after over 70 years of brutal communism. In the world of modern diplomacy, Putin is the foremost adult in a room of impulsive Western boys and avaricious megalomaniacs.
Any sovereignty Ukraine possessed disappeared when the US State Department engineered a coup d’état where democratically elected president Viktor Yanukovych was forced to flee in 2014. These events were called the “Maidan Revolution.” In the Western media it was called the “Revolution of Dignity.” It was one of the Empire’s many “color revolutions” to isolate and chip away at Russia and expand the Empire’s hegemony.
The main narrative created by the Empire, the American war party, neo-cons, and their supportive conservative pundits is, “Ukraine is a sovereign country, and it deserves our US protection and support.”
Yet the opposite is true. The US-led regime change in Ukraine’s government was under the direct control of the United States, which has installed its successive puppets. Americans are very comfortable with effecting “regime change” while hypocritically talking about “respecting sovereignty.” The dissonance could not be clearer.
If the American commentators are really concerned about Ukraine sovereignty, shouldn’t they be exposing the past actions against Ukraine’s sovereignty by the US State Department and NATO?
The 50-year-old Oscar-winner, who is from an ultra-conservative Catholic family, is alleged to have told sheriff’s deputy James Mee: “F****** Jews. The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.”
It is claimed Gibson then asked: “Are you a Jew?’
Feb. 25, 2022 – According to the stars, the United States is finally getting a spiritual makeover with its first-ever Pluto Return on Feb. 22, 2022. Astrologically, a Pluto return is when the heavenly body returns to the same position in a birth chart where it was when the chart began. It happens around every 248 years, meaning this is the Pluto return in the United States since the country was founded in 1776.
“Pluto rules death and rebirth, influencing the end and beginning of new karmic cycles. It also rules things like interpersonal skills, power struggles, and shows the source of your personal power. This planet is the portal through which your spiritual and shadow energy is transformed and released into the exterior world,” astrologer Lauren Ash tells Bustle.
Pam talks about the US Pluto return, what that means, and how it will actually affect the world.
The video is about PLUTO RETURN 2022 United States Fall of Babylon | Destruction and Rebirth
The swastika is one of the most recognizable symbols 
in India, and is a part of the Indian culture in Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism, representing an ancient Sanskrit word meaning “well being.” The hooked cross symbol of the swastika has a rich history, dating back thousands of years. But, it was only this past century that the symbol grew a completely different meaning and became the symbol of suppression and inhuman extermination.
The first use of the hooked cross was on ivory sculptures from 10,000 BCE.
From everything including advertising, design and even hockey jerseys, the swastika was soon becoming a popular design among anyone and everyone. In fact, American military units used the symbol as part of their uniform in the First World War and RAF planes had the symbol painted on them as late as 1939. source
The comparison of swastikas:
Project Veritas is an American far-right activist group founded by James O’Keefe in 2010. The group produces deceptively edited videos of its undercover operations, which use secret recordings in an effort to discredit mainstream media organizations and progressive groups.
Founder: James O’Keefe
Dr Reiner Fuellmich is the public frontman for an international team comprised of hundreds lawyers and medical experts, who have begun legal proceedings over the CDC, the WHO, and the Davos group for committing crimes against humanity.
The protocol for the PCR test given by the WHO and the CDC was knowingly set to a level that guaranteed 100% false positives or false negatives.
So there is no pandemic.
This is all about getting people to take the shot. Their argument is that we are at the very least being subjected to an illegal experiment. And at the worst, global genocide.
Dr Fuellmich points out how the experimental jab is in clear violation of all ten of the Nuremberg Codes, which carry the penalty of death for those who violate them.
Number 1: Voluntary consent is absolutely essential. There should be no intervention or any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.
By definition, a vaccine must provide immunity to the virus, protect recipients from getting the virus, reduce deaths, infections, circulation and transmission of the virus.
We are told the experimental jab does none of these, yet they fraudulently call it a “vaccine”. As far as duress, restraint and coercion, it’s everywhere: If you want your life back, get the shot.
Number 2: The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results unprocurable by other methods. The most fruitful method would be a healthy immune system, which can be achieved through good health and natural supplements, such as Vitamin D and Vitamin C and Zinc but the people are not being told this. In fact, those that point it out are being vilified and silenced.
Number 3: The experiment should be designed and based on the results of animal experimentation. This experimental jab skipped animal testing.
Number 4: The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. According to official reports, there are already thousands of deaths and over a quarter of a million injuries from this experiment.
Number 5: No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur. Past trials have shown a strong possibility that these new spike proteins will cause a body to attack itself. This is known as Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) and recent doctors have blown the whistle that this could end up killing everybody who’s been vaccinated in the next two years.
Number 6: The risk to be taken should never exceed the benefit. COVID-19 has a 98-99% survival rate, less deadly than the seasonal flu. The experimental jab is already the most dangerous vaccine in VAERS’ 30-year history.
Number 7: Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death. There were no preparations made. There are no facilities. The subject shows up for their shot and goes home.
Number 8: The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically-qualified persons. This experiment has been exclusively run by politicians, the media, celebrities and Big Pharma bureaucrats.
Number 9: The subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end. Thousands of medical experts have attempted to end this madness and their voices continue to be silenced.
Number 10: The experiment must be brought to an end, if resulting in injury or death.
This is the first installment of what will be our final messages. Not sure how many we will be able to release before the window closes. Part 2 will clarify some of this.
The shortages and supply chain collapse that reared their head in 2021 escalate in 2022. This is a logistical certainty. The chain reaction set off by the mandates is just beginning.
The corporate media and the politicians don’t want to talk about the blockades by port workers and truckers or the rebellion brewing among the military and frontline workers. They don’t want you to think about the implications of firing millions of people at the same time. Sending families with children into poverty, while simultaneously withdrawing social safety nets for the non-compliant. Doing so would make it obvious that that the tragedy that about to unfold was neither unforeseen nor accidental.
David Zublick, from Dark Outpost presents the real reason for the masses, world wide be vaccinated
TRANSCRIPT
This is the self-perception of the leaders of the world, who have tremendous power, who run entire governments.
They are planning to wipe out most of humanity, 6 billion people, to leave only a small part of us, but not only that.
They are planning and are only held back by the current limits of science to violate man himself, to desecrate the innermost part of man, the image of God within us, and to destroy that image, in order to turn human beings into a cross between a biological, technical and digital being.
They call this “post-human”, they call it “convergence”.
These world leaders are marching under the banner of transhumanism and posthumanism.
Before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves a clinical trial to begin, scientists perform laboratory tests and studies in animals to test a potential therapy’s safety and efficacy. If these studies show favorable results, the FDA gives approval for the intervention to be tested in humans.
Clinical trials are conducted in phases, each with slightly different objectives and increasing numbers of volunteers. This is primarily to ensure subject safety but also to make sure the process is as cost-effective as possible. The data from each phase is thoroughly reviewed and must show both safety as well as the desired effect before progressing from one phase to the next. While most vaccine studies are relatively long clinical trials, often around six to 12 months, safety and efficacy can often be established earlier than the end of the study. The later assessments are then used to demonstrate how long the protection from the vaccine is likely to last.
Pre-clinical
Before a vaccine is considered for human trials, it has to have robust data from laboratory and animal studies to make the investigators, as well as an independent ethics committee, confident it is very likely to be both safe, as well as effective. Once this is the case, it can move to phase 1 trials in humans.
Phase 1
Phase 1 trials are relatively small trials, usually around 100 volunteers, with the primary objective of confirming the safety already strongly expected from animal studies. Generally, blood tests are collected from the volunteers for testing of the vaccine’s efficacy in the laboratory. This gives an indication of whether the vaccine has generated an immune response that is likely to be useful but doesn’t guarantee it is going to work. Often multiple doses are used to try and find the ideal dose to take forward in later phase trials. Phase 1 trials are often conducted in a relatively narrow age range of healthy subjects with no comorbidities to reduce the prospect of confounders (something that would influence the result) and to ensure safety.
Phase 2
Phase 2 trials are still mostly focused on safety but now include a greater number of subjects, often in the order of 1000 to 2000. Laboratory studies of effectiveness are also conducted in phase 2 but actual protection from the pathogen in question starts to be looked at. A slightly more diverse population can sometimes be considered for enrolment, such as a broader age range, to begin to more closely resemble the actual target population. While giving the first look at actual protection, these studies are usually not large enough for us to confirm the vaccine actually does what it needs to do, and that is to protect people from the infection it’s designed to provide protection from. This is where the phase 3 trials come in.
Phase 3
Phase 3 trials are the pivotal final trials before a vaccine is approved for widespread use. While safety remains a focus, these trials are primarily about showing that people that have received the vaccine have significantly lower rates of actual infection than those that have not. To show this typically requires large numbers of volunteers, in the order of 10’s of thousands, depending however on many factors including how widespread the infection is that the vaccine is designed to protect from. While vaccines can fail to show sufficient effect and therefore fail to progress through any phase, it is the failure to provide sufficient protection in phase 3 studies where a number of potential vaccine candidates prove unsuccessful.
Phase 4
Once a vaccine is in widespread use, data collection on its safety, as well as how well it is working, continues to be collected in what is known as phase 4.
Length of clinical trials (also redefined to change publics’ concent)
While typically clinical trials take many years, this is largely because of the cost of each step. Therefore, the time and money for each phase is not invested until the prior phase is complete and has demonstrated the desired safety and efficacy.
In the case of COVID-19, we have been fortunate to see sufficient investment that has enabled planning for all phases of clinical trials to take place at the beginning, allowing the next phase of clinical trials to commence quickly, so as soon as the data from the previous phase supports it. This has meant that we are seeing vaccine development happen at a rate much faster than ever before without compromising at all on any of the usual processes required to be certain about the vaccine‘s safety, as well as how well it is likely to work.
“Usually it takes 8 to 10 years to conduct a robust set of clinical trials before approving a vaccine. This does beg the question of how COVID-19 vaccine developers will combine the phases of the trials to deliver a vaccine to the population in record time. We will have to watch this space!”
see article right
Posted Sept. 23, 2020 by Cathey Saha
In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, everyone has a vested interest in the development of a SARS-CoV2 vaccine that can successfully protect the population and prevent further deaths from occurring. The herd immunity of a vaccinated population would ideally allow our society to somewhat return to our pre-pandemic lifestyles, even with the pathogen existing in our environment. Although we are eagerly anticipating its creation, and many companies are racing to be the first to produce and distribute it globally, a vaccine has to first display a safe pharmacological profile, show efficacy in humans, and importantly, have benefits that outweigh the risks before it can receive approval from drug regulatory bodies.
Initially, preclinical research and development is carried out in the laboratory using in vitro techniques or, if necessary, in vivo techniques in animals. Animal models can be given the vaccine to see if an immune response is produced. If the data from preclinical research shows promise, it is then used to justify subsequent clinical studies in humans.
Phase I clinical trials occur in a small group of healthy adult individuals, approximately 20-100 to evaluate safety. They answer the following questions;
Phase II clinical trials study the intervention in a larger group of people (several hundred), stratified by age, to determine efficacy and to further evaluate its safety. They answer the following questions;
Phase III studies study the safety and efficacy of the intervention in large groups of trial participants (from several hundred to several thousand) over time. They answer the following questions;
The regulators will then review the trial results and determine whether to approve the vaccine or not.
Drug companies may decide to conduct Phase IV trials after a vaccine is released. The manufacturer can continue to test the vaccine for safety, efficacy, and other potential uses. In the case of COVID-19, it may be necessary given the variability in the widespread population taking the vaccine.
Therefore, it is clear that each stage of the trial provides important information regarding whether the vaccine works in individuals, and whether there are side effects. Usually it takes 8 to 10 years to conduct a robust set of clinical trials before approving a vaccine. This does beg the question of how COVID-19 vaccine developers will combine the phases of the trials to deliver a vaccine to the population in record time. We will have to watch this space!
**** Warning, after unsuccessful searches lately on the DR Dereck Knauss identity, it is possible that the links have been removed to discredit the Dr. or simply that he does not exist. Dr. Michel Chossudovsky is a real doctor, so the 2nd part is verified and verifiable.****
The following statements by Dr. Derick Knauss on the identity of the virus and on the failures of the PCR test are corroborated by numerous scientific studies including the WHO. See the text by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky at the foot of Dr. Knauss’ article
I have a PhD in virology and immunology. I’m a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 “supposed” positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch’s postulates and observation under a SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples.
What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test.
We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples. We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious. 
The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died.
I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with. We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated and purifed sample of Covid 19. If they can’t or won’t send us a viable sample,
I say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious. The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs.
With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in any lab world wide has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That’s because they’ve never really found the virus, all they’ve ever found was small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway.
So what we’re dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19 does not exist and is fictitious. I believe China and the globalists orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a novel virus) to bring in global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this plot included massive election fraud to overthrow Trump.
Dr. Derek Knauss is a clinical lab specialist focussing on virology and immunology. He is based in Southern California. read from source
In this video I discuss some of the ways the non-native electromagnetic frequencies cause potential disruptions in the balance of bacteria which occupy the human body. EMFs emitted from mobile devices and Wifi routers (etc) appear to have the ability to:
1. Promote the growth of pathogenic microorganisms
2. Reduce the growth of other “beneficial” microorganisms
3. Interfere with the growth of yeasts
4. Interfere with the skin microbiota.
However, this is an UNDER STUDIED topic, and I would bet that the effects span far beyond what is listed above. If you chronically expose yourself to these EMFs, are glued to your mobile phone 24/7, and live in a Wifi-rich enviroment… then you would do well to make serious changes. Further reading: www.eonutrition.co.uk/blog/is…
Edward J Berry
Servant Law
206 3rd Ave East
Oneonta, AL 35121
205-588-0555
Charles Eddie Floyd
Floyd & Floyd Attorneys at Law
P.O. Box 759
Phenix City, AL 36868-0759
(334) 297-3378
Milton Clay Ragsdale
Ragsdale LLC
517 Beacon Parkway West
Birmingham, AL 35209
(205) 290-6800
Edward Ira Zwilling
Law Office of Edward I. Zwilling, LLC
4000 Eagle Point Corporate Drive
Birmingham, AL 35242
(205) 822-2701
Andrew Donald Downing
Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC
3030 N. Third Street
Suite 790
Phoenix, AZ 85012
(602) 257-9160
Glynn Weldon Gilcrease
Law Office of Glynn W. Gilcrease, Jr., PC
4500 South Lakeshore Drive
Suite 368
Tempe, AZ 85283
(480) 897-0990
Brian Lee Burchett
Burchett Law Firm
605 C Street
Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 230-8431
Neal Jordan Fialkow
Neal Fialkow Esq
215 North Marengo Avenue
3rd Floor
Pasadena, CA 91101
(626) 584-6060
Marvin Firestone
Marvin Firestone, MD, JD and Associates
1700 South El Camino Real
Suite 408
San Mateo, CA 94402
(650) 212-4900
Michael Avrim Firestone
Marvin Firestone, MD, JD and Associates
1700 South El Camino Real
Suite 408
San Mateo, CA 94402
(650) 212-4900
William I. Goldsmith
Goldsmith & Hull, APC
16933 Parthenia Street
No. 110
Northridge, CA 91343
(818) 990-6600
Paul Adrian Green
Law Office of Paul Green
1055 East Colorado boulevard
5th Floor
Pasadena, CA 91106
626-381-9893
Anthony A. Liberatore
A. LIBERATORE, P.C.
100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700
Santa Monica, CA 90401
424-285-8550
Lawrence Steven Paikoff
Law Offices of Lawrence S. Paikoff, M.D., J.D.
1756 Picasso Avenue
Suite F
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 297-1144
Jeffrey S. Pop
Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates
9150 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 241
Beverly Hills, CA 90212-3429
(310) 273-5462
Lisa Annette Roquemore
Law Office of Lisa A. Roquemore
30021 Tomas Street
Suite 300
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688-2128
(949) 622-5572
Gerald Edwin Rush
Rush Law and Consulting, APC
333 S. Grand Avenue
Suite 3310
Los Angeles, CA 90071
(213) 232-1620
John Leonard Shipley
937 Woodbury Lane
Davis, CA 95616
(415) 235-9310
Bradley S. Freedberg
Bradley S. Freedberg, P.C.
730 17th Street
Suite 900
Denver, CO 80202
(303) 892-0900
Elizabeth Kyla Abramson
Maglio Christopher & Toale, P.A.
1015 15th Street, NW
Suite 1125
Washington, DC 20005
888-952-5242
Leah VaSahnja Durant
Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC
1717 K Street, NW
Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
(202) 775-9200
Renee J. Gentry
Vaccine Injury Clinic, George Washington Univ. Law School
2000 G Street, NW
Washington, DC 20052
(202) 994-8161
Renee Ja Gentry
The Law Office of Renee J. Gentry
2020 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Suite 164
Washington, DC 20006
(202) 505-6435
Michael Patrick Milmoe
Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC
1717 K Street, NW
Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
(202) 775-9200
LeeAnne Pedrick
Maglio, Christopher, & Toale PA
1015 15th St. NW
Suite 1125
Washington, DC 20005
888-952-5242
Joseph Alexander Vuckovich
Maglio Christopher & Toale, P.A.
1015 15th Street, NW
Suite 1125
Washington, DC 20005
888-952-5242
Robert Hanreck
Robert J. Hanreck, P.A.
44 West Flagler Street
Suite 1775
Miami, FL 33130
786-539-4935
Alison H. Haskins
Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA (FL)
1605 Main Street
Suite 710
Sarasota, FL 34236
(888) 952-5242
Erin Adele Juzapavicus
Milam Howard Nicandri Dees & Gillam, P.A.
14 East Bay Street
Jacksonville, FL 32202
(904) 357-3660
Daniel James Leeper
Leeper & Leeper
2532 Fifth Avenue North
St. Petersburg, FL 33713
(727) 328-8788
Altom M. Maglio
Maglio Christopher and Toale
1605 Main Street
Suite 710
Sarasota, FL 34236
(888) 952-5242
Jennifer Anne Gore Maglio
Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA (FL)
1605 Main Street
Suite 710
Sarasota, FL 34236
(888) 952-5242
William Richard McBride
McBride Scicchitano & Leacox, PA
800 N. Magnolia Avenue
Suite 1800
Orlando, FL 32803
(800) 336-6000
Kyle Monroe Moore
Law Office of Kyle Moore
5901 17th Ave N
St. Petersburg, FL 33710
678-316-7318
Diana Lynn Stadelnikas
Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA (FL)
1605 Main Street
Suite 710
Sarasota, FL 34236
(888) 952-5242
Anne Carrion Toale
Maglio Christopher and Toale
1605 Main Street
Suite 710
Sarasota, FL 34236
(941) 952-5242
Joshua Aaron Whisler
The Whisler Law Firm
7777 Glades Road
Suite 100
Boca Raton, FL 33434
(561) 708-0513
Julius Vincent Cook
Cook & Tolley LLP
P.O. Box 1927
Athens, GA 30603-1927
(706) 549-6111
Susan M. Cremer
Law Offices of Michael Lawson Neff, PC
945 East Paces Ferry Road
Suite 1770
Atlanta, GA 30326
(404) 531-9700
Donald Philip Edwards
Edwards & Hawkins, LLC.
50 Hurt Plaza SE
Ste 910
Atlanta, GA 30303
404-526-8866
Caryn Suzanne Fennell
Caryn S. Fennell, P.C.
2230 Towne Lake Parkway
Building 600, Suite 140
Woodstock, GA 30189
(770) 479-0248
Nathan Pate Powell
Webb, Tanner & Powell, P.C.
P.O. Box 1390
Lawrenceville, GA 30046
(770) 962-0100
David Gregory Rogers
Rogers, Hofrichter & Karrh, LLC
225 S. Glynn Street
Suite A
Fayetteville, GA 30214
(770) 460-1118
Dennis W Potts
Dennis W. Potts, Esq.
841 Bishop Street
Suite 1628
Honolulu, HI 96813
(808) 537-4575
Bryn E. Hazelwonder
Whitfield & Eddy, PLC
699 Walnut Street
Suite 2000
Des Moines, IA 50309
515-288-6041
Zachary James Hermsen
Whitfield & Eddy Law
699 Walnut Street
Suite 2000
Des Moines, IA 50309
(515) 558-0171
Richard H. Moeller
Moore, Heffernan, et al.
501 Pierce Street
Suite 300
P.O. Box 3207
Sioux City, IA 51102-3207
(712) 252-0020
Nicole Kathryn Nobbe
Moore, Heffernan, et al., LLP
501 Pierce Street
Suite 300
P.O. Box 3207
Sioux City, IA 51102-3207
(712) 252-0020
Paul R. Brazil
Muller Brazil, LLP
715 Twining Road
Suite 208
Dresher, PA 19025
(215) 885-1655
David John Carney
Green & Schafle LLC
2332 S. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19145
215-326-9256
Lawrence R. Cohan
Saltz Mongeluzzi & Bendesky
One Liberty Place
1650 Market Street
Ste 52nd Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19103
215-575-3887
Samuel A. Dion
Dion & Goldberger
1845 Walnut Street,
Set 1199
Philadelphia, PA 19103
(215) 546-6033
Jeffrey A. Golvash
GOLVASH & EPSTEIN, LLC
9 Dewalt Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15227
(412) 882-4717
Jerry Allan Lindheim
Locks Law Firm
601 Walnut Street
Suite 720 East
Philadelphia, PA 19106
215 893-3421
Charles W. Marsar
R.J. Marzella & Associates, P.C.
3513 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 234-7828
Rudolph L. Massa
Massa Law Group, PC
401 Liberty Avenue
Three Gateway Center, Suite 1543
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 338-1800
Maximillian J. Muller
Muller Brazil, LLP
715 Twining Road
Suite 208
Dresher, PA 19025
(215) 885-1655
Kari Elizabeth Panza
R.J. Marzella & Associates, P.C.
3513 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 234-7828
Amy A. Senerth
Muller Brazil, LLP
715 Twining Road
Suite 208
Dresher, PA 19025
(215) 885-1655
Steven Edwards Winslow
Jubelirer Pass & Intrieri, P.C.
219 Fort Pitt Boulevard
Suite FL 1
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 281-3850
Bradley Ryan Hine
11254 W. Hickory Loop Drive
Boise, ID 83713
(208) 779-0826
IL: ILLINOIS
Kristina Kay Green
Kralovec, Jambois & Schwartz
60 West Randolph
4th Floor
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 782-2525
Steven K Jambois
Kralovec, Jambois and Schwartz
60 West Randolph
4th Floor
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 782-2525
Steven H. Jesser
Steven H. Jesser, Attorney at Law, PC
2700 Patriot Blvd.
Suite 250
Glenview, IL 60026-8021
(800) 424-0060
Edward M. Kraus
Law Offices of Chicago Kent
565 West Adams Street
Suite 600
Chicago, IL 60661
(312) 906-5072
Joseph Paul Shannon
Shannon Law Group, PC
3550 Hobson Road
Hobson Professional Center – Suite 203
Woodbridge, IL 60517
(312) 578-9501
Kristina Kay Green
Kralovec, Jambois & Schwartz
60 West Randolph
4th Floor
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 782-2525
Steven K Jambois
Kralovec, Jambois and Schwartz
60 West Randolph
4th Floor
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 782-2525
Steven H. Jesser
Steven H. Jesser, Attorney at Law, PC
2700 Patriot Blvd.
Suite 250
Glenview, IL 60026-8021
(800) 424-0060
Edward M. Kraus
Law Offices of Chicago Kent
565 West Adams Street
Suite 600
Chicago, IL 60661
(312) 906-5072
Joseph Paul Shannon
Shannon Law Group, PC
3550 Hobson Road
Hobson Professional Center – Suite 203
Woodbridge, IL 60517
(312) 578-9501
Dustin Francis Fregiato
Ladendorf Law
7310 North Shadeland Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46250
(317) 842-5800
Kathy Ann Lee
Christie Farrell Lee & Bell, P.C.
951 N. Delaware St.
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-488-5500
David P. Murphy
David P. Murphy, Attorney at Law
504 West Main Street
Greenfield, IN 46140
317-462-2222
Daniel Henry Pfeifer
Pfeifer, Morgan & Stesiak
53600 North Ironwood Drive
South Bend, IN 46635
(574) 272-2870
Lawrence Gene Michel
Kennedy, Berkley, et al.
119 West Iron Avenue
7th Floor
Salina, KS 67402-2567
(785) 825-4674
William Patrick Ronan
The Ronan Law Firm
10740 Nall Avenue, Suite 160
Highlands Corporate Campus, Building 1
Overland Park, KS 66205
(913) 652-9937
Anthony P. Ellis
Ellis Law Group, PLLC
517 W. Ormsby Avenue
Louisville, KY 40203
(502) 255-1076
Nicole Marie Avitabile
Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman, LLC
Suite 1810
Boston, MA 02110
617-367-2900
Heather M. Bonnet-Hebert
ROBERT B. FEINGOLD & ASSOCIATES
700 Pleasant Street, Suite 520
P.O. Box 7822
New Bedford, MA 02742-7822
508-999-1119
Christopher Davidson Fletcher
Rawson, Merrigan & Litner, LLP
185 Devonshire Street
Suite 1100
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 348-0988
Howard Scott Gold
Howard S . Gold
18 Moran Circle
Sudbury, MA 01776
781-239-1000
Randy Mather Hitchcock
Whitfield Sharp & Hitchcock, LLC
196 Atlantic Avenue
Marblehead, MA 01945
(781) 639-1862
Ronald Craig Homer
Conway, Homer, P.C.
16 Shawmut Street
Boston, MA 02116
(617) 695-1990
Russell D. Luiz
Law Office of Russell D. Luiz
66 N 2nd Sreet
New Bedford, MA 02740
774-305-4159
Timothy J. Mason
Law Office of Sylvia Chin-Caplan, LLC
53 State Street
Suite 500
Boston, MA 02109
617-419-7162
Elaine Whitfield Sharp
Whitfield, Sharp & Sharp
196 Atlantic Avenue
Marblehead, MA 01945
(781) 639-1862
William J. Fleischaker
Fleischaker & Williams
418 S. Wall Avenue
P.O. Box 996
Joplin, MO 64802
417-623-2865
Fred Alexander O’Neill
Perkins & O’Neill, LLC
304 East Walnut
Thayer, MO 65791
(417) 264-7118
Jenifer Marie Placzek
Placzek Winget & Placzek
2750 E Sunshine St
Springfield, MO 65804
417-883-4000
Matthew B. Vianello
Jacobson Press P.C.
222 South Central Avenue
Suite 550
Clayton, MO 63105
314-899-9789
Verne E. Paradie
Paradie & Rabasco
217 Main Street, Suite 400
Lewiston, ME 04240
207-333-3583
Scott William Rooney
Nemes, Rooney P.C.
26050 Orchard Lake Road
Suite 300
Farmington Hills, MI 48334
(248) 442-3300
Jennifer Leigh Allen
Allen Law LLC
4512 Alpine Rose Bend
Ellicott City, MD 21042
443-223-7871
Patrick Joseph Hughes
Patriots Law Group of Lyons & Hughes
5819 Allentown Road
Suitland, MD 20746
(301) 952-9000
Kimm Hudley Massey
Massey Law Group
16701 Melford Boulevard
Suite 400
Bowie, MD 20715
301-982-4529
Patrick Dugan McKevitt
Whiteford, Taylor & Preston (MD)
7 St. Paul Street
Suite 1500
Baltimore, MD 21202-1626
410-347-9447
Yuri Jelokov
Farrish Johnson Law Office
1907 Excel Drive
Mankato, MN 56001
(507) 625-2525
Randall G. Knutson
Knutson & Casey Law Firm
196 St. Andrews Drive
Suite 100
Mankato, MN 56001
(507) 344-8888
Kathleen Margaret Loucks
Lommen Abdo Law Firm
1000 International Centre
920 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 339-8131
Kate Gerayne Westad
SiebenCarey
901 Marquette Avenue
Suite 500
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 333-9777
Frank Mell Ferrell
Frank M Ferrell APLC
202 Ashley Drive
Shreveport, LA 71105-3602
318-222-2984
David Joseph Schexnaydre
Schexnaydre Law Firm
2895 Highway 190
Suite 212
Mandeville, LA 70471
(985) 292-2020
Kristi Suzanne Schubert
Lamothe Law Firm, LLC
400 Poydras Street
Suite 1760
New Orleans, LA 70130
(504) 704-1414
Brittany Rose Wolf-Freedman
Gainsburgh, Benjamin, David, Meunier & Warshauer, LLC
1100 Poydras Street
Suite 2800
New Orleans, LA 70163
504-522-2304
Lorraine J. Mansfield
Law Office of Lorraine Mansfield
6655 West Sahara Avenue
No. B200
Las Vegas, NV 89146
(702) 222-4009
Karen H. Ross
Law Office of Karen Ross
2275 Corporate Circle
Suite 160
Henderson, NV 89074
(702) 485-4152
Heather Varney Menezes
Shaheen & Gordon, P.A.
180 Bridge Street
Manchester, NH 03104
(603) 635-4099
Matthew J. Plache
Law Office of Matthew J. Plache
65 Brackett Road
Wolfeboro, NH 03894
(603) 630-9422
Christine M. Smith
Law Office of Christine M. Smith, R.N., MSN
37 Salmon Street
Manchester, NH 03104
(603) 647-7200
Catherine D. Aughey
HoganWillig, PLLC
2410 North Forest Road
Suite 301
Amherst, NY 14068
(716) 636-7600
Matthew F. Belanger
Faraci Lange, LLP
28 East Main Street
Suite 1100
Rochester, NY 14614
(585) 325-5150
Kathryn Lee Bruns
Faraci Lange, LLP
28 East Main Street
Suite 1100
Rochester, NY 14614
(585) 325-5150
Patricia Ann Finn
Patricia Finn, P.C.
58 East Route 59
Suite 4
Nanuet, NY 10954
(845) 398-0521
William J. Gerken
The Coppola Firm
3960 Harlem Road
Buffalo, NY 14226
716-839-9700
Robert P. Goodwin
Walsh Roberts & Grace
400 Rand Building
14 Lafayette Square
Buffalo, NY 14203
(716) 856-1636
Corey J. Hogan
Hogan, Willing, Esquire
One John James Audubon Pkwy
Suite 210
Amherst, NY 14228
(716) 636-7600
Ryan C. Johnsen
HoganWillig, PLLC
2410 North Forest Road
Suite 301
Amherst, NY 14068
(716) 636-7600
Robert Joel Krakow
Law Office of Robert J. Krakow, P.C.
233 Broadway
Suite 2320
New York, NY 10279-2320
(212) 227-0600
John F. McHugh
Law Office of John McHugh
233 Broadway
Suite 2320
New York, NY 10279
(212) 483-0875
Michael William Pottetti
Law Office of Michael Pottetti
407 East Main Street
Suite 74
Port Jefferson, NY 11777
631-533-3270
Martin Jeffrey Rubenstein
Martin Rubenstein
191 Douglas Road
Staten Island, NY 10304
646-206-1928
Bruce William Slane
Law Office of Bruce W. Slane, P.C.
188 East Post Road
Suite 205
White Plains, NY 10601
(914) 269-2010
Mark Gordon Strauss
107 University Place
Ste 3h
New York, NY 10003
646-647-9091
Jessica Ann Wallace
Siri & Glimstad, LLP
200 Park Avenue
17th Floor
New York, NY 10166
(212) 532-1091
Jimmy A. Zgheib
Zgheib Sayad, P.C.
75 South Broadway
4th Floor
White Plains, NY 11209
(914) 729-1110
Carol L. Gallagher
Carol L. Gallagher, Esquire, LLC.
822 Shore Road
Somers Point, NJ 08244
(609) 927-2726
Louis P. McFadden
McFadden Law Firm
1800 New Rd.
Ste 100
Northfield, NJ 08225
609-380-2540
Mark Theodore Sadaka
Law Offices of Sadaka Associates, LLC
155 North Dean Street
Suite 4d
Englewood, NJ 07631-2524
800-810-3457
Kenneth W. Thayer
Brandon J. Broderick, Attorney at Law, LLC
850 Bear Tavern Road
Suite 106
Ewing, NJ 08003
609-434-2037
Phyllis Widman
Widman Law Firm, LLC
2312 New Road
Unit 103
Northfield, NJ 08225
(732) 829-3416
Dan Wilson Bolton
Bolton Law, PLLC
5000 Centre Green Way
Suite 500
Cary, NC 27513
(919) 228-6484
Nichole Glance Booker
Mast Law Firm
PO Box 119
Smithfield, NC 27577
(919) 934-6187
Leslie Cooper Harrell
Mullins, Duncan, et al.
300 North Greene Street
Suite 2000
Greensboro, NC 27401
336-645-3320
John Alan Jones
Martin & Jones, PLLC
410 Glenwood Avenue, Ste. 200
Raleigh, NC 27603
(919) 821-0005
Nancy Routh Meyers
Turning Point Litigation
300 North Greene Street
Suite 2000
Greensboro, NC 27401
336-645-3324
Allison Overbay Mullins
Turning Point Litigation
300 North Greene Street
Suite 2000
Greensboro, NC 27401
(336) 645-3320
Philip James Roth
Marshall, Roth & Gregory, PC
90 Southside Avenue
Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28801
(828) 281-2100
John Richard Taylor
Zaytoun Law Firm
3130 Fairhill Drive,
Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
(919) 832-6690
Kimberly Wilson White
Wilson Law, P.A.
434 Fayetteville St.
Suite 2060
Raleigh, NC 27601
919-890-0180
Darlene Mayre Carroll
Carroll Law Firm, PLLC
10404 Vineyard Boulevard
Suite E
Oklahoma City, OK 73120
(405) 596-0451
Timothy Patrick Clancy
Clancy & Thompson, PLLC
2738 East 51st Street
Suite 130
Tulsa, OK 74170
918-494-0007
Eric J. Neiman
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP (OR)
888 SW Fifth Avenue
Suite 900
Portland, OR 97204
(971) 712-2802
Curtis R. Webb
Curtis R. Webb
P. O. Box 429
Monmouth, OR 97361
(503) 623-7002
Roberto E. Ruiz-Comas
RC Legal & Litigation Services PSC
Suite 801
Resolucion St. No. 33
San Juan, PR 00920
(787) 777 – 8000
Christopher E. Hultquist
Law Office of Christopher E. Hultquist, Esq.
56 Pine Street
Suite 200
Providence, RI 02903
(401) 524-0018
James Aaron Ostendorf
Wistow Sheehan & Loveley, PC
61 Weybosset Street
Providence, RI 02903
(401) 831-2700
Mary Lee Briggs
The Law Office of Mary Lee Briggs
Post Office Box 885
Mount Pleasant, SC 29465
(843) 277-9785
Andrew Gordon Melling
Burr & Forman LLP
Post Office Box 11390
29211
Columbia, SC 29211
803-799-9800
Robert David Proffitt
Proffitt & Cox, LLP
140 Wildewood Park Drive
Suite A
Columbia, SC 29223
803-834-7097
Robert Deniger Cobb
Nahon, Saharovich & Trotz
488 South Mendenhall Road
Memphis, TN 38117
(901) 683-7000
William E. Cochran
Black McLaren, et al., PC
530 Oak Court Drive
Suite 360
Memphis, TN 38117
(901) 762-0535
Justin Glenn Day
Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLC
First Horizon Bank
800 S. Gay Street
Suite 1100
Knoxville, TN 37929
865-247-0080
Celia Farrar Hastings
Greg Coleman Law, PC
800 S. Gay Street
First Tennessee Plaza, Suite 1100
Knoxville, TN 37929
(865) 247-0080
William Bliss Hicky
William B. Hicky, Attorney at Law
Two American Center
3102 West End Avenue
Suite 400
Nashville, TN 37209
(615) 933-6611
Russell W. Lewis
1019 16th Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37212
615-200-1122
Michael G. McLaren
Black McLaren, et al., PC
530 Oak Court Drive
Suite 360
Memphis, TN 38117
(901) 762-0535
Brian Robert Arnold
Brian R. Arnold & Associates
600 West Campbell Road
Suite 3
Richardson, TX 75080
(214) 739-4216
Michael Adly Baseluos
Baseluos Law Firm, PLLC
4211 Modena Drive
San Antonio, TX 78218
(210) 787-5993
Scharli Sturtevant Branch
Cantey Hanger
600 W 6th st Ste 300
Fort Worth, TX 76102
817-877-2802
Gil L. Daley
Law Office of Gil L. Daley, II, P.C.
201 Main Street
Suite 600
Fort Worth, TX 76102
(817) 763-9553
Sean Franks Greenwood
Greenwood Law Firm
1415 North Loop West
Suite 1100
Houston, TX 77008
(832) 356-1588
Michael Philipp Gross
Howie Law, PC
2608 Hibernia Street
Dallas, TX 75204-6340
(214) 622-6340
Margaret M Guerra
Margaret M. Guerra, Attorney at Law
1000 Macon Street
Suite 300
Fort Worth, TX 76102
(817) 570-9991
Koby Jack Kirkland
Mejias Lindsay, PLLC
4900 Woodway Drive
Suite 750
Houston, TX 77056
832-426-4574
Randal Gilbert Mathis
Mathis & Donheiser, P.C.
1412 Main Street, Suite 2600
Dallas, TX 75202
214-728-0690
Russell Anthony Murray
Lovett Law Firm
619 Arizona Ave
El Paso, TX 79902
(915) 757-9999
Daniel J. Smith
Smith & Smith
6040 Camp Bowie Boulevard
Suite 14
Fort Worth, TX 76116
(817) 877-5750
Jeffrey Del Enquist
Christensen & Jensen, P.C.
257 East 200 South
Suite 1100
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
801-323-5000
David Charles Richards
Christensen & Jensen, P.C.
257 East 200 South
Suite 1100
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
(801) 323-5000
Timothy Paul Bosson
Bosson Legal Group, P.C.
8300 Arlington Blvd., Suite B2
Fairfax, VA 22031
(571) 775-2529
Gary Alvin Bryant
Willcox & Savage, P.C.
440 Monticello Avenue
Suite 2200
Norfolk, VA 23510-2197
(757) 628-5500
Thomas Scott Carnes
Roy, Larsen, Carnes & Romm, P.C.
109-A Wimbledon Square
Chesapeake, VA 23320-4932
(757) 271-0571
Jesse James Johnson
Johnson Gardy & Teumer
3508 Robs Drive
Suffolk, VA 23435
(757) 539-0350
Isaiah Kalinowski
Bosson Legal Group
8300 Arlington Boulevard
Suite B2
Fairfax, VA 22031
571-771-3225
Alexander Laufer
Eisenhower and Laufer, PC
10560 Main Street
Suite 218
Fairfax, VA 22030
(703) 352-9690
Harrison Whitten Long
Rawls Law Group (Richmond)
211 Rocketts Way
Suite 100
Richmond, VA 23231
804-344-0038
Elizabeth Martin Muldowney
Sands Anderson PC
1111 East Main Street – Suite 2400
P. O. Box 1998
Richmond, VA 23218-1998
(804) 783-7227
Nicholas Paul Provenzo
155 Somervelle St.
Alexandria, VA 22304
(703) 625-3295
Ramon Rodriguez
Sands Anderson PC
1111 East Main Street – Suite 2400
P. O. Box 1998
Richmond, VA 23218-1998
(804) 783-7229
Glen Howard Sturtevant
Rawls Law Group (Richmond)
211 Rocketts Way
Suite 100
Richmond, VA 23231
(804) 344-0038
David Alexander Tierney
Rawls Law Group (Richmond)
211 Rocketts Way
Suite 100
Richmond, VA 23231
(804) 782-0617
Paul S. Dannenberg
Paul Dannenberg Law Offices
325 Delfrate Rd.
Huntington, VT 05462
802-434-3901
Kelly Danielle Burdette
Burdette Law, PLLC
249 Main Avenue S., Suite 107 #333
98045
North Bend, WA 98045
206-235-5048
Douglas Lee Burdette
Burdette Law, PLLC
249 Main Street, Suite 107
Number 333
North Bend, WA 98045
(206) 441-5597
Theodore J. Hong
Maglio Christopher & Toale (WA)
1325 Fourth Avenue
Suite 1730
Seattle, WA 98101
(888) 952-5242
Jessi Carin Huff
Mctlaw
8816 SE 77th Place
Mercer Island, WA 98040
888-952-5242
Michael Spencer Kolker
Otorowski Morrow & Golden, PLLC
298 Winslow Way West
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
(206) 842-1000
Matthew N. Menzer
Menzer Law Firm, PLLC
705 Second Avenue
Suite 800
Seattle, WA 98104
(206) 903-1818
Jessica Anne Olins
Maglio Christopher & Toale (WA)
1325 Fourth Avenue
Suite 1730
Seattle, WA 98101
888-952-5242
Danielle Anne Strait
Maglio Christopher & Toale (WA)
1325 Fourth Avenue
Suite 1730
Seattle, WA 98101
888-952-5242
Kristin M. Cafferty
Habush, Habush & Rottier, S.C. (Racine, WI)
5439 Durand Avenue
Suite 220
Racine, WI 53406
(262) 554-6200
Jerome A. Konkel
Samster Konkel and Safran
11063 W. Bluemound Rd.
Suite 205
53226
Wauwatosa, WI 53226
414-224-0400
Andrew Mark Krueger
Krueger & Hernandez S.C. (Middleton)
8215 Greenway Boulevard
Suite 590
Middleton, WI 53562
(608) 824-9540
Joseph Michael Russell
Von Briesen & Roper, S.C.
411 East Wisconsin Ave.
Suite 1000
Milwaukee, WI 53202
(414) 287-1414
Scott B. Thompson
Gingras, Cates & Luebke, S.C.
8150 Excelsior Drive
Madison, WI 53717
(608) 833-2632
Stephanie Ann Thompson
Krueger & Hernandez S.C. (Middleton)
8215 Greenway Boulevard
Suite 590
Middleton, WI 53562
(608) 824-9540
Ryan Truesdale
Groth Law FIrm, S.C.
11063 West Bluemound Road
Wauwatosa, WI 53226
414-375-2030
Jason Wendell Whitley
Novitzke, Gust, Sempf & Whitley
314 Keller Avenue N
Suite 200
Amery, WI 54001
(715) 268-6130
Peter M. Young
Habush, Habush & Rottier, S.C.
3100 Eagle Avenue
P.O. Box 1987
Wausau, WI 54402-1987
(715) 842-4444
Kathy A. Brown
Kathy Brown Law, PLLC
P.O. Box 631
Charleston, WV 25322
(304) 720-2351
Richard Gage
Richard Gage, P.C. (WY)
1815 Pebrican Avenue
P.O. Box 1223
Cheyenne, WY 82003
(307) 433-8864
| AL: ALABAMA Edward J Berry Servant Law 206 3rd Ave East Oneonta, AL 35121 205-588-0555 Charles Eddie Floyd Floyd & Floyd Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 759 Phenix City, AL 36868-0759 (334) 297-3378 Milton Clay Ragsdale Ragsdale LLC 517 Beacon Parkway West Birmingham, AL 35209 (205) 290-6800 Edward Ira Zwilling Law Office of Edward I. Zwilling, LLC 4000 Eagle Point Corporate Drive Birmingham, AL 35242 (205) 822-2701 AZ: ARIZONA Andrew Donald Downing Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC 3030 N. Third Street Suite 790 Phoenix, AZ 85012 (602) 257-9160 Glynn Weldon Gilcrease Law Office of Glynn W. Gilcrease, Jr., PC 4500 South Lakeshore Drive Suite 368 Tempe, AZ 85283 (480) 897-0990 CA: CALIFORNIA Brian Lee Burchett Burchett Law Firm 605 C Street Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 230-8431 Neal Jordan Fialkow Neal Fialkow Esq 215 North Marengo Avenue 3rd Floor Pasadena, CA 91101 (626) 584-6060 Marvin Firestone Marvin Firestone, MD, JD and Associates 1700 South El Camino Real Suite 408 San Mateo, CA 94402 (650) 212-4900 Michael Avrim Firestone Marvin Firestone, MD, JD and Associates 1700 South El Camino Real Suite 408 San Mateo, CA 94402 (650) 212-4900 William I. Goldsmith Goldsmith & Hull, APC 16933 Parthenia Street No. 110 Northridge, CA 91343 (818) 990-6600 Paul Adrian Green Law Office of Paul Green 1055 East Colorado boulevard 5th Floor Pasadena, CA 91106 626-381-9893 Anthony A. Liberatore A. LIBERATORE, P.C. 100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700 Santa Monica, CA 90401 424-285-8550 Lawrence Steven Paikoff Law Offices of Lawrence S. Paikoff, M.D., J.D. 1756 Picasso Avenue Suite F Davis, CA 95618 (530) 297-1144 Jeffrey S. Pop Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates 9150 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 241 Beverly Hills, CA 90212-3429 (310) 273-5462 Lisa Annette Roquemore Law Office of Lisa A. Roquemore 30021 Tomas Street Suite 300 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688-2128 (949) 622-5572 Gerald Edwin Rush Rush Law and Consulting, APC 333 S. Grand Avenue Suite 3310 Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 232-1620 John Leonard Shipley 937 Woodbury Lane Davis, CA 95616 (415) 235-9310 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO: COLORADO Bradley S. Freedberg Bradley S. Freedberg, P.C. 730 17th Street Suite 900 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 892-0900 | |||||
This toolbox provided by the UnityProject has the following resources:
Petition
Downloadable Letter to School / School Boards / Elected Officials
Parent Non Consent Form
Downloadable Flyer
A study recently published in the Journal of the American Heart Association confirms: Elevated blood pressure was effectively reduced after an average of 10 days of fasting, as evidenced by a study of 1610 fasting patients at the Buchinger Wilhelmi Clinic in Überlingen, Germany. 690 subjects in this group had high blood pressure before fasting.
Among them 377 people took antihypertensive drugs, the administration of which could in most cases either be stopped or reduced during fasting as blood pressure fell or remained within the normal range. Since antihypertensive drugs often have serious side effects, long-term fasting could be used as a complementary therapy for high blood pressure. In 920 people with normal blood pressure, blood pressure was reduced while staying within the normal range. Low blood pressure values showed a tendency to increase. The results of the study were published in the Journal of the American Heart Association in November 2020 under the title “Blood pressure changes in 1610 subjects with and without antihypertensive medication during long-term fasting” by the authors Franziska Grundler, Robin Mesnage, Andreas Michalsen and Françoise Wilhelmi de Toledo.
High blood pressure is an important and widespread risk factor for life-threatening diseases such as heart attack or stroke and is mainly caused by an unhealthy lifestyle. Risk factors for high blood pressure include obesity, malnutrition, lack of exercise, stress, smoking, and excessive consumption of salt, sugar or alcohol. According to European medical societies, the threshold above which one speaks of high blood pressure is 140/90 mmHg. The study proves that long-term fasting according to the Buchinger Wilhelmi programme has a beneficial effect on blood pressure. Elevated blood pressure fell both in patients who were treated with medication and in those who were not. The longer the fasting lasted, the stronger the effect. The positive effects of fasting on blood pressure can be explained by the reduction in weight due to fasting, a reduction in waist circumference and the interruption of salt, alcohol and carbohydrate intake and, if necessary, smoking. Fasting triggers mechanisms that act in a similar way to antihypertensive drugs: it promotes the excretion of sodium, activates the parasympathetic nervous system and causes vasodilation. The improvement in blood pressure continued for four days after the fasting ended. Closer examination showed that long-term fasting effectively lowers blood pressure, especially in people with high body weight, lipid and glucose metabolism disorders and in older people.
Future studies will investigate whether these positive results can be sustained over the medium and long term, which is likely to depend on lifestyle changes.
Contact: Dr. Françoise Wilhelmi de Toledo E-Mail: francoise.wilhelmi@buchinger-wilhelmi.com Franziska Grundler, Robin Mesnage, Andreas Michalsen und Françoise Wilhelmi de Toledo: „Blood pressure changes in 1610 subjects with and without antihypertensive medication during long-term fasting, Journal of the American Heart Association, (2020;9:e018649). DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018649 : https://www.buchinger-wilhelmi.com/en/publications-of-the-buchinger-wilhelmi-clinics/
One-third of American adults have high blood pressure – a risk factor for heart disease, stroke, kidney disease, and chronic heart failure. In an effort to bring down their blood pressure, many of these 67 million US adults take Big Pharma remedies, but a new study indicates flax seeds could be an inexpensive solution for lowering blood pressure. source
Ingredients: (All mixed in a 1 teaspoon amount at least 1/2 hour prior to breakfast)
a) Freshly squeezed lemon
b) Extra virgin olive oil (make sure it is certified)
1 – Proponents of the swap theory have pointed out disparities in the number of portholes on the ships. The Olympic had 16 and the Titanic had 14.
2 – Photographs taken of the Titanic in dry dock show it with 14 portholes. But by the time of its doomed maiden voyage it now had 16, just like the Olympic.
3 – Was this evidence that the ships had been swapped or just that they had added two extra portholes as part of aesthetic changes to the Titanic?
4 – Other evidence supports the switch , the windows on the Olympic were somewhat unevenly spaced, but more evenly spaced on the Titanic.
5 – Again, by the time of its maiden voyage, the Titanic had acquired unevenly spaced windows like the Olympic.
6 – The damage to the Olympic after its collision with the Hawke lent it a noticeable and permanent 2˚ list to port. The undamaged Titanic had no such list.
7 – However, one second-class passenger who survived the sinking - Lawrence Beesley, later reported the Titanic did, in fact, list to port, stating “the Titanic listed to port…It was plain she did so, for the sky-line and sea on the port side were visible most of the time and on the starboard only sky”.
8 – Beesley, a science teacher, was considered a reliable observer, and would later write one of the first books about the Titanic disaster.
9 – There was a nationwide coal strike during the launch of the Titanic, leading to thousands of firemen, boiler stokers and greasers short of work.
10 – Yet despite this the Titanic struggled to find crew, with many men refusing to work on the ship at any price.
11 – Rumours were circulating amongst the workers at Harland and Wolff that the ships had been swapped as part of an insurance scam, and Titanic was to be sunk.
12 – Did foreknowledge of the sinking of the Titanic frighten men off from wanting to work on the ship?
13 – Despite the immense fanfare and hype that surrounded the Titanic launch, it was only just over half full when it left Southampton on its doomed voyage.
14 – Did White Star want to minimise the number of passengers because it intended to scuttle the ship? Or had the rumours of the insurance scam spread outside of the shipyards?
15 – Several last minute cancellations from high profile passengers certainly suggest some kind of foreknowledge.
17 – Many of the richest and most prestigious names in early 20th-century society were booked onto the Titanic.
18 – JP Morgan – the international financier who owned the White Star’s parent company, was due to travel on the Titanic but cancelled his trip a few days before the departure, claiming illness.
19 – A New York Times reported discovered this to be a lie, Morgan was actually seen perfectly well with his mistress in France on the very day Titanic sunk.
20 – Industrialist Henry Clay Frick and his wife, banker Horace J. Harding and billionaire George Washington Vanderbilt – all connected to Morgan, were amongst several other prominent figures who cancelled at the last minute.
21 – The SS Californian, also owned by JP Morgan, was a large passenger ship that was ultimately blamed for the loss of life on the Titanic.
22 – It behaved somewhat oddly around the time of the Titanic’s voyage.
23 – Carrying no passengers, it steamed into the middle of the Atlantic, stopped and waited. It’s only cargo was 3000 woollen blankets and jumpers.
24 – What was the purpose behind this curious manoeuvre? Was the Californian intended to rescue the Titanic’s passengers after its deliberate sinking?
25 – Edith Russell, a survivor of the sinking, was adamant that Titanic officers assured her the Californian was on its way.
26 – Author Robin Gardiner suggests serious navigation errors lead to the Californian stopping in the wrong area, some 12 miles away from the Titanic.
27 – With the Californian unable to complete its rescue mission the Titanic was doomed, and some 1500 passengers and crew perished in one of the worst maritime disasters in modern history.
28 – The wreck of the Titanic was discovered by Robert Ballard in 1985. Some evidence from the wreck supports the switch theory.
29 – The stamp 401, the ID number used for the Titanic at Harland and Wolff, can be seen on the Titanic’s propeller.
30 – However, some authors have suggested that the Titanic propeller was fitted to the Olympic during its repair following the collision with the Hawke.
If true, this would be strong evidence that the vessel on the ocean floor was really the Olympic.
31 – What appear to be the letters M and P can also be seen on the side of the wreck. Could that be the remains of the ship’s original etched nameplate – ‘OLYMPIC’, covered over with the Titanic’s as part of the scam?
32 – The wreck appears to show some evidence of the grey paint used as an undercoat on the Olympic. The Titanic used black paint for its undercoat.
33 – Insurance scams and maritime fraud were common at the time of the Titanic’s sinking.
34 – Whilst it seems unlikely such a scam could be pulled off today, the lack of media coverage in 1912 makes it more credible.
35 – Only one film survives of the Titanic and the photo record is also scant. With the two ships extremely similar, it is argued that only the most eagle-eyed would ever have spotted the swap.
36 – Whilst the wreck of the Titanic found in 1985 provided some evidence in favour of the swap theory, more emerged that suggest the ship found at the bottom of the Atlantic really was the Titanic.
37 – The Titanic’s identification number – 401, is stamped in multiple places on the wreck, and on furniture and other artefacts found by salvagers. Could the swap really have been so elaborate to include swapping furniture and decor between the two ships?
38 – Titanic scholars and historians say the proponents of the insurance swap theory have overstated how similar the two ships were.
39 – Whilst superficially alike, there were several important structural differences, as well as aesthetic changes made to Titanic to distinguish it from its sister.
40 – The 1st class A deck on Titanic was enclosed in a glass screen but was open on the Olympic. Titanic’s wheelhouse was flat at the front and the Olympics 44curved.
41 – Olympic’s B deck had a 1st class promenade, whereas Titanic had private verandas and suites. Indeed many passengers were booked into the suites, an impossibility if the ship was really the Olympic.
42 – Many sceptics of the insurance swap theory have pointed out that even if an insurance scam made financial sense to the White Star line, the loss of reputation they would suffer if one of their vessels sunk would be devastating.
43 – Losing the Titanic on its maiden voyage would be a publicity disaster for White Star and lead to a loss of confidence in the company amongst passengers.
44 – The intention behind the Olympic class liners was to attract rich first class passengers and offer them the finest in luxury and opulence. With image paramount, a sinking would prove to be a catastrophe for the company.
45 – The Titanic was infamously described as ‘unsinkable’. Whilst this proved to be incorrect, only a freak set of circumstances managed to sink it.
46 – Could plotters really have engineered something so complex as the sinking of the world’s largest vessel, in the middle of the Atlantic ocean?
47 – With so many variables and so many things that could go wrong how could they be sure they would succeed?
48 – If their plan was discovered the consequences would have been dire. The perpetrators would be blamed for the deaths of 1500 people, perhaps even charged with their murder.
49 – Would the likes of White Line and JP Morgan – a billionaire who could afford any potential losses on the Olympic, really risk the gallows for an insurance scam?
50 – The Olympic, or, if the insurance swap theory is true the Titanic disguised as the Olympic, continued to serve for many years.
51 – It acted as troop transport in WW1 and resumed service as a luxury liner in the 20s and 30s before been finally retired in 1935.
52 – In all of that time, no evidence that the ship was really the Titanic was ever discovered. Even when it was dismantled in 1936 there was no indication that the ship was anything other than the Olympic.
The British Government began transporting convicts overseas to American colonies in the early 18th century. When transportation ended with the start of the American Revolution, an alternative site was needed to relieve further overcrowding of British prisons and hulks. Earlier in 1770, James Cook charted and claimed possession of the east coast of Australia for Britain. Seeking to pre-empt the French colonial empire from expanding into the region, Britain chose Australia as the site of a penal colony, and in 1787, the First Fleet of eleven convict ships set sail for Botany Bay, arriving on 20 January 1788 to found Sydney, New South Wales, the first European settlement on the continent. Other penal colonies were later established in Van Diemen’s Land (Tasmania) in 1803 and Queensland in 1824.[2] Western Australia – established as Swan River Colony in 1829 – initially was intended solely for free settlers, but commenced receiving convicts in 1850. South Australia and Victoria, established in 1836 and 1850 respectively, officially remained free colonies. However, a population that included thousands of convicts already resided in the area that became known as Victoria.
“Health Canada has said, that they discovered that there was something being released from these graphene mask that could caused pulmonary problems”
The term “nanoform graphene” refers to the carbon coating on the masks.
Jim Thomas, research director at ETC Group, has spent the past two decades tracking the toxicity of nanomaterials.
“We were one of the first groups to raise concerns about them back in 2002,” said the Quebecer, who has been based in Nelson, B.C., for the past year.
When he learned from his sister-in-law that masks containing nanoform graphene were being used in Quebec schools, “I hit the roof,” Thomas said. “It’s crazy.” source
Dr. Joe Schwarcz explains graphene face masks
(Many times you are unable to hit the undo button in life)
We bring to the attention of Global Research readers this important interview with Ricardo Delgado Martin, Founder and Director of Quinta Columna. Ricardo is responsible for coordinating the Spanish research team’s analysis of the impacts of graphene oxide nano-particles contained in the vial of the mRNA vaccine.
The results of their analysis by electron microscopy and spectroscopy are far-reaching. Graphene oxide is a toxin which triggers thrombi and blood coagulation. It also has an impact on the immune system. Graphene oxide accumulated in the lungs can have devastating impacts.
The results of the Spanish study suggest, yet to be fully confirmed, that the recorded vaccine related deaths and “adverse events” (e.g. published in the US by the CDC and in the EU) are attributable to the presence of graphene oxide nano-particles contained in the Covid vaccine vial.
Of significance, (acknowledged by national health authorities) graphene oxide is also contained in the face mask.
Graphene has electromagnetic properties which have been detected in people who have been vaccinated. These effects have been amply documented and confirmed. See the study conducted by the European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance. source
On the other side of this debate are those who feel that glyphosate represents a significant threat to our health. Researchers, like our guest today, look at the available science and have concluded that, by a multitude of mechanisms, glyphosate may well be responsible or at least contributory for a vast array of human ailments, from autism to dementia to autoimmune disease, and so many more.
This debate extends to the confusion surrounding the safety of GMO food. For the most part, the genetic modification of plant seeds is undertaken so that the newly developed plant is not damaged by the weed targeting action of glyphosate. This allows farmers to spray GMO crops with glyphosate, kill the weeds, and still harvest the undamaged plant. But while there may or may not be concern about the specific genetic modification of the plant, this whole scenario sets the stage for glyphosate to appear in our foods and throughout our environment.
That said, this is a fundamental nuance to the GMO debate that absolutely must enter the discussion.
Dr. David Perlmutter is on a mission of empowerment as America’s Neurologist – visit site
The Glyphosate Effect: How The World’s Most Common Herbicide Is Undermining Your Health And What You Can Do
By Staff Reporter – Nov. 8, 2021
The pathway to new world order …
From Henry Makow
Phase 1: Simulate a threat and create fear. (December 2019-March 2020)
– Mount a plandemic
– Kill tens of thousands of elderly people.
– Increase the number of cases and deaths
– Position vaccination as the only solution from the beginning.
– Focus all attention on Covid-19.
Result, (almost) general panic
Phase 2: Sow the tares and division. (March 2020-December 2020)
– Impose multiple unnecessary, liberticidal and unconstitutional coercive measures.
– Paralyze trade and the economy.
– Observe the submission of a majority and the resistance of a rebellious minority.
– Stigmatize the rebels and create a horizontal division.
– Censoring dissident leaders.
– Punish disobedience.
– Generalize PCR tests.
– Create confusion between cases, infected, sick, hospitalized and dead.
– Disqualify all effective treatments.
– Hope for a rescue vaccine.
Result, (almost) general panic.
Phase 3: Bring a treacherous and deadly solution. (December 2020-June 2021)
– Offer a free vaccine for everyone.
– Promise protection and return to normality.
– Establish a herd immunization target.
– Simulate a partial recovery of the economy.
– Hide statistics of side effects and deaths from injections.
– Passing off the side effects of the injections as “natural” effects of the virus and the disease.
– Recover the notion of a variant as a natural mutation of the virus.
– Justify the maintenance of coercive measures by not applying the herd immunity threshold.
– Punish health professionals for the illegal exercise of care and healing.
Result, doubts and feelings of betrayal among the vaxx, discouragement among opponents.
Phase 4: Install Apartheid and the QR code. (June 2021-October 2021)
– Voluntarily plan for shortages.
– Impose the vaccination pass (QR code) to reward the vaccinated, punish the resistant.
– Create an Apartheid of the privileged against the others.
– Take away the right to work or study from non-vaxx.– Withdraw basic services to the non-vaxx.
– Impose PCR payment tests on non-vaxx.
Result, First stage of digital control, impoverishment of opponents
Phase 5: Establish chaos and Martial law. (November 2021-March 2022)
– Exploit the shortage of goods and food.
– Cause the paralysis of the real economy and the closure of factories and shops.
– Let unemployment explode.
– Apply a third dose to the vaxx (boosters).
– Take up the murder of the living old men.
– Impose compulsory vaccination for all.
– Amplify the myth of variants, the efficacy of the vaccine and the immunity of the herd.
– Demonize the anti-vaxx and hold them responsible for the dead.
– Arrest opposition leaders.
– Impose digital identity on everyone (QR code): Birth certificate, identity document, passport, driving license, health insurance card …
– Establish martial law to defeat the opposition.
Result, Second stage of digital control. Imprisonment or removal of opponents.
Phase 6: Cancel the debts and dematerialize the money. (March 2022-September 2022)
– Trigger the economic, financial and stock market collapse, the bankruptcy of the banks.
– To rescue the losses of the banks in the accounts of their clients.
– Activate the «Great Reset».
– De-materialize money.
– Cancel debts and loans.
– Impose the digital portfolio. (Digital Wallet)
– Seize properties and land.
– Ban all global medicines.
– Confirm the obligation to vaccinate semi-annually or annually.
– Impose food rationing and a diet based on the Codex Alimentarius.
– Extend the measures to emerging countries.
Result, Third stage of digital control. Extension of the N.O.M. to the whole planet. source
1.) It’s not a vaccine. The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine does not provide immunity to Covid or it’s variants so you can still catch Covid and transmit it to others making you asymptomatic. You will likely need a booster shot every 6 months, so get ready to roll up that sleeve every six months once that system rolls out.
[link to www.bustle.com]
2.) The 95% efficacy is the RRR (Relative Reduction Risk) where the real reduction rate ARR (Absolute Reduction Risk) is less than 2% as per this scientific Lancet study.
[link to www.thelancet.com]
This means you are really not protected much at all, as the architects of this phony pandemic would like you to ‘believe.’
3.) The lipid nanoparticles in the vaccines do not remain in the intramuscular region of the deltoid muscle. They seep out into the cardiovascular system infecting the entire body with spike-protein. Something the manufacturers claimed would never happen, yet it does and is why the adverse-side effects are so bad with this shot.
[link to www.sciencedirect.com]
4.) The spike-protein itself is toxic and a part of the disease pathology being the cause of inflammation, ACE2 deregulation and opens up immunity pathways. This means Myocarditis (heart inflammation), Encephalitis (brain inflammation ) and hepatomegaly (liver inflammation) are huge risks and confirmed by many adverse-reactions reported to VAERS and EuroVigilance.
Dr. Byram W. Bridle, Ph.D. says the he and several colleagues gained access to a first-of-its-kind “biodistribution” study out of Japan showing that even when injected in muscle tissue in the arm, the mRNA (messenger RNA) injections from Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech cause the production of spike proteins that more often than not get into the bloodstream and cause deadly blood clots, heart and brain damage, and infertility.
“The spike protein on its own is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system,” Bridle warned during a recent radio interview.
“If you inject the ‘purified’ spike protein into the blood … [there is] all kinds of damage to the cardiovascular system, it can cross the blood-brain barrier and cause damage to the brain.”
“Nobel Laureate claims ‘vaccinated people will die in 2 years’: Fact check | Oneindia News” Any videos opposing the known risk of “vaccines” will be deleted by Google’s Youtube.
This video however is approved by Youtube as it supports Big Pharma
The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.
This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behavior for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.
This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided.
This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.
The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended into general codes of medical ethics.
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1– The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2– The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3– The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
4– The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5– No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6– The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7– Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
8– The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9– During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10– During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
I don’t know how else to put this. I had my second dose of Pfizer two weeks ago and I’ve become convinced there is something in these vaccines that cuts people off from spirit.
It’s like my consciousness has been leashed and life has turned the volume down real low. I had an intense spiritual awakening about 2 years ago triggered by psychs and it’s like all the connection I gained has been erased. I think this is some kind of evil alien tech I’m not even joking. Like Law of One Orion type shit, to stop us ascending whatever that means. I can’t describe the change in my awareness, I struggle to believe it myself. Like my Mode of Operation has been changed. I’m lucky I’m even conscious of it, because I feel like most people aren’t really in touch with spirit and wouldn’t notice anything wrong. For me this is hell. And I know some of you know what I’m talking about when I say I feel like I’ve betrayed my soul’s mission. It’s like there is no forgiveness for me, I’ve failed and allowed myself to fail knowing something was wrong, I didn’t have faith. Part of me thinks I did this on purpose because my connection was so painful. But nothing is worse than this, I’d rather be suffering.
I can no longer:
– Feel empathy, or deep emotion, heartfelt emotion. You know that thing in your chest where you feel, physically, not intellectually. It’s gone. No love, happiness, sadness, anger, anything. No compassion.
– Transcend myself in meditation, feel infinity, God and the like. Like I’ve been reduced to my 5 senses, and even those have been diminished.
– Feel my intuition at all, no gut feelings whatsoever, it’s like I’m completely blind.
– Feel music, art, food. Be passionate about anything, have motivation for anything, I don’t even feel hungry or tired, I feel nothing. Not a numbness, not a dissociation (I’ve had both), but a straight up lack, a severance to that spark that animates our inner lives.
– Lucid dream, astral project, even feel my energetic body at all. It’s like it has dissipated.
– Sleep properly at all, and when I do it’s like I can’t enter as deep a sleep as I used to.
– Breathe or yawn as deeply as I used to?? Which may seem unrelated but breath = prana = lifeforce…ygm. Basically I feel like a bot
If anyone knows ANYTHING about this or how to reverse it. I’ve seen all the shit about funvax and whatever, if this is science it has to be reversible somehow. Hopefully if I don’t take boosters and work on my connection I might be able to improve it. If anyone has been through the same or knows anyone who has, DM me. I had an extremely strong intuition (last one I’ve felt) telling me I would basically die if I took this dose, but my mother is my weak spot and I caved to her (doesn’t help that I’m financially dependent on her etc.) but honestly I should’ve become homeless rather than do this. Now I’d rather become homeless than ever take a booster shot. There is no life without love and yet that is the life I’m now living. So yeah. If anyone had their doubts about the vax, here is my theory on what it does, based on personal experience – source 1 source 2 search results
The black material is Graphene oxide. It is reacting to the waves from the phone call on the phone nearby.
”A Breatharian is a person who can, under the proper conditions, live with or without eating physical food.” Just as the sun is nourishment for plants, this same energy can fuel your body without the need for food.
The practice of breatharian is not doing away with food or water, but more importantly in the synchronization of mind and body with that of the laws of the universe which allows you to be more self reliant on pulling energy from all around you which sustains wellness.
The Breatharians are those who living on light and energies derived from the sun. But it is no magic trick. Prana Yoga as it is otherwise called, was practiced by many a wise person, for centuries, in India.
– Current treatment protocols (e.g. invasive ventilation) are actively harmful to patients, accelerating oxidative stress and causing severe VILI (ventilator-induced lung injuries). The continued use of ventilators in the absence of any proven medical benefit constitutes mass murder.
– Existing countermeasures are inadequate to slow the spread of what is an aerosolized and potentially wastewater-borne virus, and constitute a form of medical theater.
– Various non-vaccine interventions have been suppressed by both the media and the medical establishment in favor of vaccines and expensive patented drugs.
– The authorities have denied the usefulness of natural immunity against COVID-19, despite the fact that natural immunity confers protection against all of the virus’s proteins, and not just one.
– Vaccines will do more harm than good. The antigen that these vaccines are based on, SARS-CoV-2 Spike, is a toxic protein. SARS-CoV-2 may have ADE, or antibody-dependent enhancement; current antibodies may not neutralize future strains, but instead help them infect immune cells.
– Also, vaccinating during a pandemic with a leaky vaccine removes the evolutionary pressure for a virus to become less lethal.
– There is a vast and appalling criminal conspiracy that directly links both Anthony Fauci and Moderna to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
– COVID-19 vaccine researchers are directly linked to scientists involved in brain-computer interface (“neural lace”) tech, one of whom was indicted for taking grant money from China.
Independent researchers have discovered mysterious nanoparticles inside the vaccines that are not supposed to be present.
– The entire pandemic is being used as an excuse for a vast political and economic transformation of Western society that will enrich the already rich and turn the rest of us into serfs and untouchables.
Fair use excerpt. Read the whole article here.
Spartacus was a Thracian gladiator who, along with Crixus, Gannicus, Castus, and Oenomaus, was one of the escaped slave leaders in the Third Servile War, a major slave uprising against the Roman Republic. Little is known about him beyond the events of the war, and surviving historical accounts are sometimes contradictory. Wikipedia
Who is Spartacus which identifies with the article, “COVID-19: The Spartacus Letter” to your left? “Whoever Spartacus is, they have a very elaborate knowledge in “the field”. If you want to know a lot more about the no. 1 issue in the world today, read it. And don’t worry if you don’t understand every single word, neither do I. But I learned a lot.” source www.theautomaticearth.com/2021/09/spartacus/
Overwhelming, heart-breaking Evil. It’s the shock of the real – and it’s a small glimpse of things to come. This video, the first of a series of five to be released over the next several weeks was filmed secretly at a Federal hospital and it will be a game-changer in this information war, as the millions of people who see it respond.
Both events undermined US sovereignty while transforming the US dollar into the world’s reserve currency and the US Treasury and US military into the instruments of the Globalists.
Like the British Empire before it, the world was led to believe that America was the most powerful nation on Earth. The truth was that America had been hijacked by the banksters to engage in incredibly stupid war-profiteering adventures, like the invasions of Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan and through the CIA, to covertly undermine untold numbers of Third World nations around the globe.
These actions served the interests of the criminals who had hijacked America, not the interests of the US Taxpayer who unwillingly funded these operations. These wars bankrupted the US, the same way the First- and Second World Wars bankrupted the UK and I’d hazard to guess that this pump-and-dump model did not arise in the 20th century. source
In the next 60 days there is likely to be a major shift in the financial status.
Rajoelina accused the World Health Organisation of a plot to have its COVID-19 Organics, the local African ‘cure’ for the virus poisoned.
According to his claims, WHO offered a $20 million bribe to poisoned their medicine, Tanzania Perspective reported on the front-page of its 14th May edition.
WHO Offered $20M Bribe To Poison COVID-19 Cure says the President of Madagascar as reported by Tanzania Perspective. The President of Madagascar believes the only reason the rest of the world has refused to treat Madagascar’s cure for the coronavirus with urgency and respect is that the remedy comes from Africa.
In an interview with French media, President Rajoelina reportedly said he has noticed what he believes stems from usual condescension toward Africans.
“I think the problem is that (the drink) comes from Africa and they can’t admit… that a country like Madagascar… has come up with this formula to save the world.”
“What is the problem with Covid-Organics, really? Could it be that this product comes from Africa? Could it be that it’s not OK for a country like Madagascar, which is the 63rd poorest country in the world… to have come up with (this formula) that can help save the world?”
“If it wasn’t Madagascar, and if it was a European country that had actually discovered this remedy, would there be so much doubt? I don’t think so,” the President of Madagascar Andry Rajoelina asserted.
The remedy, COVID Organics, is made from Artemisia, a plant imported into Madagascar in the 1970s from China to treat malaria. Artemisia has had proven success against malaria and according to President Rajoelina it can cure COVID-19 patients within ten days.
However, the WHO has criticized such natural therapeutic measures against the coronavirus as blind faith. In response to the skepticism with which the WHO is treating the COVID Organics, Rajoelina said, “No country or organization will keep us from going forward.”
A host of other African countries including, Tanzania, Guinea-Bissau, DR Congo and Niger, have imported the Madagascan made recipe. source
And according to Surfside mayor Charles Burkett, roof repairs were underway at the building. He also told the news channel: ‘This [building] is from the 80s. There is no reason for this building to go down like that unless someone literally pulls out the support from underneath, or they get washed out, or there is a sinkhole or something like that, because it just went down.’
‘It’s hard to imagine how this could have happened,’ Burkett said. ‘Buildings just don’t fall down… There’s no reason for this building to go down like that unless someone literally pulls the supports out from underneath.’
Above – (A more detailed graphic showing the apparent extent of the Miami/Surfside building collapse and damage.)
A possible a sinkhole or a controlled demolition?
Officials report ‘banging noise’ coming from Surfside building rubble
There is what looks like an intense light glow in the parking structure (building at right) on the 3rd tier down from the top, then yet another one 5th tier down and then on a lower floor as it is collapsing.
go to page (bookmarkable)
by: Architects Journal
When U.S. authorities shuttered sports-wagering site Bodog.com last week, it raised eyebrows across the net because the domain name was registered with a Canadian company, ostensibly putting it beyond the reach of the U.S. government. Working around that, the feds went directly to VeriSign, a U.S.-based internet backbone company that has the contract to manage the coveted .com and other “generic” top-level domains.
EasyDNS, an internet infrastructure company, protested that the “ramifications of this are no less than chilling and every single organization branded or operating under .com, .net, .org, .biz etc. needs to ask themselves about their vulnerability to the whims of U.S. federal and state lawmakers.”
ICANN is also seeking to distance itself from the U.S. government by being more inclusive, including allowing domain names in a range of written, global languages, ending the exclusivity of the Latin alphabet in top-level domains.
Still, many outside the United States, like China, India and Russia, distrust ICANN and want control of the net’s naming system to be turned over to an organization such as the International Telecommunications Union, an affiliate of the United Nations. Last year, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin met with Hamadoun Toure, the ITU’s chief, and said he wanted international control over the internet “using the monitoring capabilities of the International Telecommunication Union.”
“If we are going to talk about the democratization of international relations, I think a critical sphere is information exchange and global control over such exchange,” Putin said, according to a transcript from the Russian government.
Just last week, Robert McDowell, a Federal Communications Commission commissioner, blasted such an idea.
“If successful, these efforts would merely imprison the future in the regulatory dungeon of the past,” he said. “Even more counterproductive would be the creation of a new international body to oversee internet governance.”
But despite EasyDNS and others’ outrage, the U.S. government says it’s gone that route hundreds of times. Furthermore, it says it has the right to seize any .com, .net and .org domain name because the companies that have the contracts to administer them are based on United States soil, according to Nicole Navas, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokeswoman.
But it is possible that the U.S. government’s big-footing over dot-com domains in the name of fighting copyright could add more weight to the arguments of those who want to put the U.N. in charge of the internet’s naming system. While that’s not inevitably a bad thing, it could lead to a world where any .com might be seizable by any country, including Russia, Libya and Iran.
Still, don’t expect Uncle Sam to give up its iron grip on .com without a fight.
PressTV domain seized by US government: Kevin Barrett & Scott Bennett Respond on Press TV
By Richard H. Curtiss
Former U.S. Foreign Service Officer
The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs
For many years the American media said that “Israel receives $1.8 billion in military aid” or that “Israel receives $1.2 billion in economic aid.” Both statements were true, but since they were never combined to give us the complete total of annual U.S. aid to Israel, they also were lies—true lies.
Recently Americans have begun to read and hear that “Israel receives $3 billion in annual U.S. foreign aid.” That’s true. But it’s still a lie. The problem is that in fiscal 1997 alone, Israel received from a variety of other U.S. federal budgets at least $525.8 million above and beyond its $3 billion from the foreign aid budget, and yet another $2 billion in federal loan guarantees. So the complete total of U.S. grants and loan guarantees to Israel for fiscal 1997 was $5,525,800,000.
One can truthfully blame the mainstream media for never digging out these figures for themselves, because none ever have. They were compiled by the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. But the mainstream media certainly are not alone. Although Congress authorizes America’s foreign aid total, the fact that more than a third of it goes to a country smaller in both area and population than Hong Kong probably never has been mentioned on the floor of the Senate or House. Yet it’s been going on for more than a generation.
Probably the only members of Congress who even suspect the full total of U.S. funds received by Israel each year are the privileged few committee members who actually mark it up. And almost all members of the concerned committees are Jewish, have taken huge campaign donations orchestrated by Israel’s Washington, DC lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), or both. These congressional committee members are paid to act, not talk. So they do and they don’t.
The same applies to the president, the secretary of state, and the foreign aid administrator. They all submit a budget that includes aid for Israel, which Congress approves, or increases, but never cuts. But no one in the executive branch mentions that of the few remaining U.S. aid recipients worldwide, all of the others are developing nations which either make their military bases available to the U.S., are key members of international alliances in which the U.S. participates, or have suffered some crippling blow of nature to their abilities to feed their people such as earthquakes, floods or droughts.
Israel, whose troubles arise solely from its unwillingness to give back land it seized in the 1967 war in return for peace with its neighbors, does not fit those criteria. In fact, Israel’s 1995 per capita gross domestic product was $15,800. That put it below Britain at $19,500 and Italy at $18,700 and just above Ireland at $15,400 and Spain at $14,300.
In a democracy, the ultimate responsibility for a nation’s actions rests with its citizens. The top rung of government – the entity with the ultimate power of governance – is the asserted will of the people. Therefore, in any democracy, it is essential that its citizens be fully and accurately informed.
In the United States, currently the most powerful nation on earth, it is even more essential that its citizens receive complete and undistorted information on topics of importance, so that they may wield their extraordinary power with wisdom and intelligence.
Unfortunately, such information is not always forthcoming.
The mission of If Americans Knew is to inform and educate the American public on issues of major significance that are unreported, underreported, or misreported in the American media.
It is our belief that when Americans know the facts on a subject, they will, in the final analysis, act in accordance with morality, justice, and the best interests of their nation, and of the world. With insufficient information, or distorted information, they may do the precise opposite.
It is the mission of If Americans Knew to ensure that this does not happen – that the information on which Americans base their actions is complete, accurate, and undistorted by conscious or unconscious bias, by lies of either commission or omission, or by pressures exerted by powerful special interest groups. It is our goal to supply the information essential to those responsible for the actions of the strongest nation on earth – the American people.
“Nucleic acid vaccines for prevention of flavivirus infection” –
This patent comes into play during the manufacturing process of vaccines for yellow fever, Zika, Dengue, West Nile virus and more. Various vaccination testing methods – When pharmaceutical companies need to test aspects of a new vaccine, they may utilize one of the CDC’s patented testing methods including an artificial lung system for aerosol vaccines and a process that screens new vaccines for human rhinoviruses. Adjuvant patents – Adjuvants are components within vaccinations intended to create an intensified immune reaction; members of the ACIP own patents on adjuvants used specifically in vaccinations created for premature babies and full term newborns. Assays that assist vaccine development – During the vaccine development process, manufacturers will often observe biological samples for specific antibodies; the CDC owns a patent on an assay that facilitates this monitoring system. Vaccine quality control – patents on various aspects of quality control for vaccinations are utilized by pharmaceutical companies on a large scale once a new vaccine is actively distributed to the public. In total, 56 individual patents were found to be owned or shared by one or more members of the ACIP committee or other committees within the CDC.
Members Claim They are Unbiased
When prompted with questions pertaining to their financial connections with pharmaceutical companies, most ACIP members claim they are able to remain unbiased despite the rewards they receive every time a new vaccination is recommended to the public. In numerous instances, vaccines released to the market are later removed after serious side effects are documented. The rotavirus vaccine was one such example; it was pulled from the market in 1999, a year after its initial approval. In 2001, the House Government Reform Committee found that four out of the eight ACIP members who voted to approve the vaccine had direct financial ties to one or more of the pharmaceutical companies who produced the vaccine for public use. Similar situations involving many other vaccinations have been independently documented over the course of nearly 20 years.
A Multi Billion Dollar Industry
The vaccination industry currently generates $30 billion in profit each year, some of which reaches the hands of the very people who create the vaccine schedule. Despite concerns connecting vaccinations to the increase in autism and a host of other disorders, the number of recommended vaccines continues to grow each year. With a new federal administration interested in uncovering the dirty secrets hidden within alliances between CDC members and vaccine manufacturers, we may begin to see a wave of personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits related directly to unethical behaviors which have led to numerous unsafe vaccines being pushed on an unknowing public. If the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) is amended or repealed, victims of vaccine damage will be legally permitted to file claims directly against vaccine manufacturers and members of the ACIP committee who often have had knowledge of vaccine risks yet continue to recommend their widespread use.
1. Criteria for Issuance
During the effective period of the HHS Secretary’s EUA declaration, FDA may authorize the introduction of a medical product into interstate commerce when the product is intended for use during an actual or potential emergency. EUA candidate products include medical products and uses that are not approved, cleared, or licensed under sections 505, 510(k), and 515 of the FDC Act or section 351 of the PHS Act.
After the requisite determination and declaration have been issued, and after feasible and appropriate consultations, FDA may issue an EUA only if FDA concludes that the following four statutory criteria for issuance have been met. If the product does not meet the statutory criteria for issuance or is not otherwise an appropriate candidate, an alternative regulatory mechanism (i.e., access under an IND or IDE, which can include expanded access protocols20) may be an appropriate means to provide patients access to an unapproved use of a product in a CBRN emergency.
a. Serious or Life-Threatening Disease or Condition
For FDA to issue an EUA, the CBRN agent(s) referred to in the HHS Secretary’s EUA declaration must be capable of causing a serious or life-threatening disease or condition.
b. Evidence of Effectiveness
Medical products that may be considered for an EUA are those that “may be effective” to prevent, diagnose, or treat serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions that can be caused by a CBRN agent(s) identified in the HHS Secretary’s declaration of emergency or threat of emergency under section 564(b). Potential EUA products also include those that may be effective to mitigate a disease or condition caused by an FDA-regulated product (including a product authorized for emergency use under section 564 or an approved product) used to diagnose, treat, or prevent a disease or condition caused by a CBRN agent.
A product may be considered for an EUA if the Commissioner determines that the known and potential benefits of the product, when used to diagnose, prevent, or treat the identified disease or condition, outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. In making this assessment, FDA must take into consideration the material threat posed by the CBRN agent(s) identified in the HHS Secretary’s declaration of emergency or threat of emergency if applicable (section 564(c)).
In determining whether the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential risks, FDA intends to look at the totality of the scientific evidence to make an overall risk-benefit determination. Such evidence, which could arise from a variety of sources, may include (but is not limited to): results of domestic and foreign clinical trials, in vivo efficacy data from animal models, and in vitro data, available for FDA consideration. FDA will also assess the quality and quantity of the available evidence, given the current state of scientific knowledge. The types of evidence that FDA may consider and that should be submitted to support a request for an EUA are discussed more fully in section III.D.2 of this guidance.
d. No Alternatives
For FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition. A potential alternative product may be considered “unavailable” if there are insufficient supplies of the approved alternative to fully meet the emergency need. A potential alternative product may be considered “inadequate” if, for example, there are contraindicating data for special circumstances or populations (e.g., children, immunocompromised individuals, or individuals with a drug allergy), if a dosage form of an approved product is inappropriate for use in a special population (e.g., a tablet for individuals who cannot swallow pills), or if the agent is or may be resistant to approved and available alternative products.
source of PDF (page 7 and 8)
Jenifer Luke Studies on Fluoridation Impact:
“Fluoride is likely to cause decreased melatonin production and to have other effects on normal pineal function, which in turn could contribute to a variety of effects in humans.” (National Research Council 2006).
In the 1990s, a British scientist, Jennifer Luke, discovered that fluoride accumulates to strikingly high levels in the pineal gland. (Luke 2001). The pineal gland is located between the two hemispheres of the brain and is responsible for the synthesis and secretion of the hormone melatonin. Melatonin maintains the body’s circadian rhythm (sleep-wake cycle), regulates the onset of puberty in females, and helps protect the body from cell damage caused by free radicals.
While it is not yet known if fluoride accumulation affects pineal gland function, preliminary animal experiments found that fluoride reduced melatonin levels and shortened the time to puberty. (Luke, 1997). Based on this and other evidence, the National Research Council has stated that “fluoride is likely to cause decreased melatonin production and to have other effects on normal pineal function, which in turn could contribute to a variety of effects in humans” (NRC, 2006, p. 256).
As a calcifying tissue that is exposed to a high volume of blood flow, the pineal gland is a major target for fluoride accumulation in humans. In fact, the calcified parts of the pineal gland (hydroxyapatite crystals) contain the highest fluoride concentrations in the human body (up to 21,000 ppm F), higher than either bone or teeth. (Luke 1997; 2001). Although the soft tissue of the pineal does not accumulate fluoride to the same extent as the calcified part, it does contain higher levels of fluoride than found than in other types of soft tissue in the body — with concentrations (~300 ppm F) that are known in other contexts to inhibit enzymes. While the impacts of these fluoride concentrations in the pineal are not yet fully understood, studies have found that calcified deposits in the pineal are associated with decreased numbers of functioning pinealocytes and reduced melatonin production (Kunz et al., 1999) as well as impairments in the sleep-wake cycle. (Mahlberg 2009).
In the United States, children are reaching the age of puberty at earlier ages than in the past — a trend that carries health consequences, including a heightened risk for breast cancer. Some evidence indicates that fluoride, via its effect on the pineal, could be a contributing cause to this trend. In animal studies, for example, fluoride exposure has been found to cause a decrease in the amount of circulating melatonin and lead to an accelerated sexual maturation in females. (Luke 1997). Similar findings have been reported in two epidemiological studies of human populations drinking fluoridated water. In the first published fluoridation safety experiment in Newburgh, New York, the authors found that girls living in a fluoridated community reached puberty five months earlier than girls living in a non-fluoridated community. (Schlesinger 1956) Later, in 1983, Farkas reported that postmenarcheal girls were “present at younger ages in the higher fluoride town than in the low-fluoride town, although the reported median ages were the same.”
Farkas G, et al. (1983). The fluoride content of drinking water and menarcheal age. Acta Univ Szeged Acta Biol. 29(1-4):159-168.
Kunz D, et al. (1999). A new concept for melatonin deficit: on pineal calcification and melatonin excretion. Neuropsychopharmacology 21(6):765-72.
Luke J. (2001). Fluoride deposition in the aged human pineal gland. Caries Res. 35(2):125-128.
Luke J. (1997). The Effect of Fluoride on the Physiology of the Pineal Gland. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Surrey, Guildford.
Mahlberg R, et al. (2009). Degree of pineal calcification (DOC) is associated with polysomnographic sleep measures in primary insomnia patients. Sleep Med. 10(4):439-45.
National Research Council. (2006). Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA’s Standards. National Academies Press, Washington D.C.
Schlesinger ER, et al. (1956). Newburgh-Kingston caries fluorine study. XIII. Pediatric findings after ten years. J Am Dent Assoc. 52(3):296-306.
In 2010 the Forbes magazine accurately reported on the WHO’s fradulent response of the Swine flue “ . . the false pandemic is one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century.”
The Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) test was adopted by the WHO on January 23, 2020 as a means to detecting the SARS-COV-2 virus, following the recommendations of a Virology research group (based at Charité University Hospital, Berlin), supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (For Further details see the Drosten Study)
Exactly one year later on January 20th, 2021, the WHO retracts. They don’t say “We Made a Mistake”. The retraction is carefully formulated. (See original WHO document here as well as in Annex)
While the WHO does not deny the validity of their misleading January 2020 guidelines, they nonetheless recommend “Re-testing” (which everybody knows is an impossibility).
The contentious issue pertains to the number of amplification threshold cycles (Ct). According to Pieter Borger, et al
The number of amplification cycles [should be] less than 35; preferably 25-30 cycles. In case of virus detection, >35 cycles only detects signals which do not correlate with infectious virus as determined by isolation in cell culture…(Critique of Drosten Study)
The World Health Organization (WHO) tacitly admits one year later that ALL PCR tests conducted at a 35 cycle amplification threshold (Ct) or higher are INVALID. But that is what they recommended in January 2020, in consultation with the virology team at Charité Hospital in Berlin.
If the test is conducted at a 35 Ct threshold or above (which was recommended by the WHO), segments of the SARS-CoV-2 virus cannot be detected, which means that ALL the so-called confirmed “positive cases” tabulated in the course of the last 14 months are invalid.
According to Pieter Borger, Bobby Rajesh Malhotra, Michael Yeadon, et al, the Ct > 35 has been the norm “in most laboratories in Europe & the US”.
The WHO’s Mea Culpa
Below is the WHO’s carefully formulated “Retraction”. The full text with link to the original document is in annex:
WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology. (emphasis added)
WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test
results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
“Invalid Positives” is the Underlying Concept
This is not an issue of “Weak Positives” and “Risk of False Positive Increases”. What is at stake is a “Flawed Methodology” which leads to invalid estimates.
What this admission of the WHO confirms is that the estimate of covid positive from a PCR test (with an amplification threshold of 35 cycles or higher) is invalid. In which case, the WHO recommends retesting: “a new specimen should be taken and retested…”.
The WHO calls for “Retesting”, which is tantamount to “We Screwed Up”.
That recommendation is pro-forma. It won’t happen. Millions of people Worldwide have already been tested, starting in early February 2020. Nonetheless, we must conclude that unless retested, those estimates (according to the WHO) are invalid.
An interview with Dr. Mullis – the scientist who invented PCR test.
In recent months an abundance of evidence has shown that the “gold standard” procedure for detecting COVID-19 is unreliable and could be producing untold numbers of false positives. If this is the case, why are health officials around the world calling for more tests? A discussion with Dr. Kary Mullis – Nobel Laureate, Chemistry – source
In recent months an abundance of evidence has shown that the “gold standard” procedure for detecting COVID-19 is unreliable and could be producing untold numbers of false positives. If this is the case, why are health officials around the world calling for more tests? A discussion with Dr. Kary Mullis – Nobel Laureate, Chemistry – source
Reports are streaming in, declaring a Dark Winter for the world due to COVID19. The media rushes to tell the public that case numbers are on the rise again. In response, case numbers are used to support calls for lockdowns, travel and dining restrictions, and the push for compulsory vaccines.
However, in recent months an abundance of evidence has shown that the “gold standard” procedure for detecting COVID-19 is unreliable and could be producing untold numbers of false positives. If this is the case, why are health officials around the world calling for more tests?
This report is a brief look into the history of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure and the evidence that PCR is unreliable and should not be used as a determinant for the number of COVID-19 cases or as a factor in political decisions. Please share with friends and family to keep them informed, and if someone shared this with you, please watch with an open mind.
In the months since the COVID-19 panic began health authorities around the world have encouraged the public to “get tested” to help track the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the strain of coronavirus that causes COVID19. However, as fear and hysteria subside, the scientific community and public at large are calling into question the efficacy of the test used to determine a patient’s status.
The main test that is used to determine an individual status involves the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. This incredibly sensitive technique was developed by Berkeley scientist Kary Mullis, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1993. The PCR method amplifies a small segment of DNA hundreds of times to make it easier to analyze. For COVID19, a process known as Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is used to detect SARS-CoV-2 by amplifying the virus’ genetic material so it can be detected by scientists.
PCR is sometimes described as a technique or process, but for simplicity we will refer to it as a test. PCR is viewed as the gold standard, however, it is not without problems. PCR amplifies a virus’s genetic material and then each sample goes through a number of cycles until a virus is recovered. This is known as the “cycle threshold” and has become a key component in the debate around the efficacy of the PCR test.
In late August 2020, I attended a press conference in Houston, Texas to ask Houston Health Authority Dr. David Persse about concerns about PCR.
Dr. Persse says that when the labs report numbers of COVID-19 cases to the City of Houston they only offer a binary option of “yes” for positive or “no” for negative. “But, in reality, it comes in what is called cycle-thresholds. It’s an inverse relationship, so the higher the number the less virus there was in the initial sample,” Persse explained. “Some labs will report out to 40 cycle-thresholds, and if they get a positive at 40 – which means there is a tiny, tiny, tiny amount of virus there – that gets reported to us as positive and we don’t know any different.”
Persse noted that the key question is, at what value is someone considered still infectious?
“Because if you test me and I have a tiny amount of virus, does that mean I am contagious? that I am still infectious to someone else? If you are shedding a little bit of virus are you just starting? or are you on the downside?.”
He believes the answer is for the scientific community to set a national standard for cycle-threshold. Unfortunately, a national standard would not solve the problems expressed by Dr. Persse.
Between 2000-2018, the Israeli military and other security forces have killed more than 9,517 Palestinians. At least 4,562 of them did not participate in hostilities. At least 2,016 were children.*
This section of Investigate includes companies that provide military and security forces in Palestine/Israel with weapons and tools consistently used in war crimes or attacks on civilians in violation of international law.
The American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) investment policy precludes investment in any company that provides products or services to military bodies, organizations, or groups that are used to facilitate or undertake violent acts against civilians or violations of international law. Hence, AFSC policy responds to human rights violations by both Israelis and Palestinians. However, this list contains only companies involvement in Israeli violations. This apparent asymmetry is a consequence of the asymmetry of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. The provision of any form of support to a Palestinian armed group or political party is illegal under U.S. anti-terrorism laws. In other words, existing legal structures enforce strict sanctions and prevent meaningful involvement of public corporations in Palestinian violations of international law, while not imposing comparable restrictions on Israel.
The companies included in this section are:
This list is limited to companies with significant, ongoing contracts, and focuses on cases with a proven direct link to war crimes, violations of international humanitarian law or human rights law. It is not intended as a general list of all weapons manufacturers or military contractors.
The American Friends Service Committee supports disarmament processes and the cessation of military sales and assistance to all parties. In 2012, AFSC joined 14 other church groups in calling on the US Congress to condition the provision of US military aid to Israel on Israel’s respect for human rights.
Related databases and resources
*Based on B’tselem definitions and data collected between September 29, 2000 and March 29, 2018. At the same time period, Palestinians have killed 428 Israeli soldiers and 818 Israeli civilians.
Occupations/Prisons
3M Company is a conglomerate corporation operating in the manufacturing, health care, and consumer goods industries. 3M Supplies materials for prison labor programs and for weapon systems used against civilians.
Asseco Poland SA – Poland
Occupations
An aggregator of information technology companies. Its subsidiary Matrix IT operates in the illegal settlement of Modi’in Illit in the occupied West Bank. Its subsidiary TGS developed the Israeli military’s command and control system.
BAE Systems PLC Our Divestment List – UK
Occupations
A British multinational defense and aerospace manufacturer that develops weapons and combat vehicles for ground, air, and naval warfare, specializing in the design of avionic electronic warfare systems. BAE has worked in cooperation with Lockheed Martin and Rafael to produce and market the naval Protector drone used to maintain the siege of Gaza along the Mediterranean coast.
Boeing Co Our Divestment List – USA
Borders/Occupations
One of the largest military companies in the world. Makes fighter jets and missile systems used by the Israeli air force against Palestinian civilians. Designed a system to surveil and monitor the US-Mexico border.
C Mer Industries Ltd – Israel
Occupations
A telecommunication, security, and infrastructure company. Its surveillance systems are used in military bases and checkpoints in the occupied West Bank. Company products are installed in multiple weapon systems used by the Israeli military against Palestinian civilians.
Caterpillar Inc Our Divestment List – USA
Occupations
A US multinational manufacturer of heavy engineering machinery. Its equipment is customized for the use of the needs of the Israeli military occupation and is used in home demolitions, the construction of the West Bank and Gaza walls, and the construction of illegal settlements.
CNH Industrial NV – UK
Occupations
An Italian manufacturer of agricultural and construction equipment. Its equipment has been used to demolish Palestinian homes under military occupation and for the construction of the West Bank separation wall and illegal settlements.
Elbit Systems Ltd Our Divestment List – Israel
Borders/Occupations
Israel’s largest weapon company. Makes killer drones, large weapon systems, and ammunition used against civilians. Monitors walls and borders in Palestine and the US-Mexico border.
Exxon Mobil Corp – USA
Occupations
The world’s largest publicly-traded oil & gas company. Provides Israel with fuel for fighter jets used by the Israeli air force against Palestinian civilians.
Ford Motor Co – USA
Occupations
A US multinational car and truck manufacturer. Its trucks are used by the Israeli military and border police to patrol the Gaza wall and for other military occupation-related purposes.
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd Our Divestment List
Israel
Occupations
A group of IT companies. Its subsidiary Matrix IT operates in an illegal settlement in the occupied West Bank. Its subsidiary TGS developed the Israeli military’s command and control system.
Genasys Inc Our Divestment List – USA
Occupations
Formerly LRAD, A US company specializing in hailing systems. Its weaponized Long Range Acoustic Device is used by the Israeli military in the occupied West Bank.
General Dynamics Corp Our Divestment List – USA
Borders/Occupations
One of the largest military contractors in the world. Provides weapons and munitions used by the Israeli air force against Palestinian civilians. Involved in monitoring the US-Mexico border and surveilling immigrant communities inside the United States.
General Electric Co Our Divestment List – USA
Occupations
A US multinational conglomerate in the manufacturing, energy, and healthcare industries, among others. Its aviation division manufactures engines for military aircraft Israel uses against civilians.
General Motors Co – USA
Occupations
A US multinational car and truck manufacturer. Its trucks are used by the Israeli military and border police to patrol the Gaza wall and for other military occupation-related purposes.
Hitachi Ltd – Japan
Occupations
A Japanese multinational conglomerate in the communications, infrastructure, electronics, transportation, heavy machinery, and financial industries, among others. Provides equipment that Israel uses to demolish homes in the occupied Palestinian territory.
Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd – South Korea
Occupations
The world’s largest shipbuilding company and a global leader in heavy equipment manufacturing. Provides equipment that Israel uses to demolish Palestinian homes in the occupied Palestinian territory.
International Business Machines Corp – USA
Borders/Occupations
One of the world’s largest IT companies. A major contractor for U.S. immigration authorities. Runs the discriminatory Israeli population registry and provides technologies to the Israeli military.
L3Harris Technologies Inc Our Divestment List – USA
Borders/Occupations
One of the world’s largest military contractors. Supplies equipment for military checkpoints in occupied Palestine and for surveillance of the US-Mexico border and immigrant communities in the US.
Lockheed Martin Corp Our Divestment List – USA
Borders/Occupations
A US defense and aerospace company that makes fighter jets, attack helicopters, and missile systems used by the Israeli military against Palestinian civilians. Its reconnaissance aircrafts monitor the US-Mexico border.
Man Group PLC – UK
Occupations
A UK multinational manufacturer of commercial vehicles and mechanical engineering equipment. Provides integral parts for a crowd control weapon specifically designed for the needs of the Israeli military occupation of Palestine.
Motorola Solutions Inc Our Divestment List – USA
Borders/Occupations/Prisons
A US-based communications and surveillance company. Leading supplier of license plate recognition software. Sells surveillance products for use at US prisons, at the US-Mexico Border, and by US police agencies. Its equipment is installed in illegal settlements and in the separation wall in the West Bank and is used by the Israeli military, police, and prison service.
Northrop Grumman Corp Our Divestment List – USA
BordersOccupations
One of the largest military companies in the world. Develops missile systems consistently used by the Israeli air force against Palestinian civilians; provides drones and radars used to monitor the US-Mexico border; and develops databases and systems for Homeland Security to profile, surveil and monitor immigrant communities.
Palantir Technologies Inc Our Divestment List – United States
Borders/Occupations
A US-based high-tech surveillance company. Designed systems for US immigration authorities to surveil and target immigrants and to manage mass immigration raids. Its predictive policing tools are used by law enforcement agencies and by Israeli security forces.
Raytheon Technologies Corp Our Divestment List – USA
BordersOccupations
One of the largest military companies in the world and the largest producer of guided missiles. Makes missile systems and munitions used against civilians in Palestine and Yemen. Its equipment is used to monitor the US-Mexico border.
Toyota Motor Corp – Japan
Occupations
A Japanese multinational automotive manufacturer. Its vehicles are used by the Israeli security forces and have been involved in guarding illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank and in executing home demolitions.
United Technologies Corp Our Divestment List – USA
Occupations
A US provider of high-tech systems, products, and services to the aerospace and commercial building industries. Its subsidiary Pratt & Whitney produces the engines for military aircraft used by the Israeli air force against Palestinian civilians.
Valero Energy Corp – USA
Occupations
A US multinational oil & gas company. Provides Israel with fuel for aircraft used by the Israeli air force against Palestinian civilians.
Volvo AB – Sweden
Occupations
A Swedish manufacturer of cars, trucks, buses, construction equipment, and industrial engines. Its equipment has been used in the demolition of Palestinian homes and the construction of illegal settlements and of the separation wall in the occupied West Bank. Its buses are serving settlements and transport political prisoners.
1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman or breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an adverse event and she should avoid having children.
2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:
A: Miscarry,
B: Spontaneously abort,
C. Poison a baby via her breast milk
D: Have babies that have cognitive difficulties.
This is universal and very bad. Here is a small section of text I translated to English:
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure
“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.
When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer safety within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.”
TO CLARIFY: Vaccine study participants become super-spreaders of something, they don’t say what it is, but it triggers secondary adverse events in people that never had the vax when they are exposed to people who did have the vax. source
Download the PDF for the Data Sheet Warnings which is provided by:
Cayman Chemical Co
Scientists are warning
What is going on in our world? Find out now!
www.stopworldcontrol.com
PROOF that the pandemic was planned with a purpose…
www.stopworldcontrol.com/proof
URGENT VIDEOS – Humanity must see this!
Watch now…
www.stopworldcontrol.com/videos
Who Are We? – Stop World Control
www.stopworldcontrol.com/about
www.stopworldcontrol.com/en/
* ” (The Palestinians are) beasts walking on two legs.” Menahim Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, “Begin and the Beasts”. New Statesman, 25 June 1982.
* “The Palestinians” would be crushed like grasshoppers … heads smashed against the boulders and walls.” ” Isreali Prime Minister (at the time) in a speech to Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 1988.
* “When we have settled the land, all the Arabs will be able to do about it will be to scurry around like drugged cockroaches in a bottle.” Raphael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces, New York Times, 14 April 1983. * “How can we return the occupied territories? There is nobody to return them to.” Golda Maier, March 8, 1969.
* “There was no such thing as Palestinians, they never existed.” Golda Maier Israeli Prime Minister June 15, 1969.
* “The thesis that the danger of genocide was hanging over us in June 1967 and that Israel was fighting for its physical existence is only bluff, which was born and developed after the war.” Israeli General Matityahu Peled, Ha’aretz, 19 March 1972.
* Ben Gurion also warned in 1948 : “We must do everything to insure they ( the Palestinians) never do return.” Assuring his fellow Zionists that Palestinians will never come back to their homes. “The old will die and the young will forget.”
* “We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimeter of Eretz Israel… Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours.” Rafael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces – Gad Becker, Yediot Ahronot 13 April 1983, New York Times 14 April 1983.
* “We must do everything to ensure they (the Palestinian refugees) never do return” David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, 18 July 1948, quoted in Michael Bar Zohar’s Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet, Prentice-Hall, 1967, p. 157.
* “We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai.” David Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978.
* “We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.” Israel Koenig, “The Koenig Memorandum.”
* “Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography books no longer exist… There is not a single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.” Moshe Dayan, address to the Technion, Haifa, reported in Haaretz, April 4, 1969.
* “We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population?’ Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said ‘Drive them out!'” Yitzhak Rabin, leaked censored version of Rabin memoirs, published in the New York Times, 23 October 1979.
* Rabin’s description of the conquest of Lydda, after the completion of Plan Dalet. “We shall reduce the Arab population to a community of woodcutters and waiters” Uri Lubrani, PM Ben-Gurion’s special adviser on Arab Affairs, 1960. From “The Arabs in Israel” by Sabri Jiryas.
* “There are some who believe that the non-Jewish population, even in a high percentage, within our borders will be more effectively under our surveillance; and there are some who believe the contrary, i.e., that it is easier to carry out surveillance over the activities of a neighbor than over those of a tenant. [I] tend to support the latter view and have an additional argument:…the need to sustain the character of the state which will henceforth be Jewish…with a non-Jewish minority limited to 15 percent. I had already reached this fundamental position as early as 1940 [and] it is entered in my diary.” Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency’s Colonization Department. From Israel: an Apartheid State by Uri Davis, p.5.
* “Everybody has to move, run and grab as many hilltops as they can to enlarge the settlements because everything we take now will stay ours… Everything we don’t grab will go to them.” Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign Minister, addressing a meeting of militants from the extreme right-wing Tsomet Party, Agence France Presse, November 15, 1998.
* “It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism,colonialization or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands.” Yoram Bar Porath, Yediot Aahronot, of 14 July 1972.
* “Spirit the penniless population across the frontier by denying it employment… Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.” Theodore Herzl, founder of the World Zionist Organization, speaking of the Arabs of Palestine,Complete Diaries, June 12, 1895 entry.* “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” — Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 (Source: N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 1994, p. 1).
* “We will establish ourselves in Palestine whether you like it or not…You can hasten our arrival or you can equally retard it. It is however better for you to help us so as to avoid our constructive powers being turned into a destructive power which will overthrow the world.” (Chaim Weizmann, Published in “Judische Rundschau,” No. 4, 1920). source
“. . . finally we return to 1999 to recall the fight between Butterbean and Bart Gun for some context the wrestling federation had organized a new style of legit tournament in which there was no script and the fighters were fighting for real . . “
An IDF (Israel Defense Force) wears a shirt boasting the efficiency of shooting any pregnant Palestinian women.
The snipers who wear shirts depicting a dead Palestinian baby with a teddy bear and his weeping mother beside him, accompanied by the inscription “Better use Durex,” the soldiers wearing shirts with a drawing of a Palestinian boy and the words, “Don’t bother running because you’ll die tired,” those who wear shirts depicting an Israeli soldier raping a Palestinian girl and the inscription “No virgins, no terror attacks,” the sharpshooters from the Givati Brigade’s Shaked battalion who wear T-shirts showing a pregnant Palestinian woman with a bull’s-eye superimposed on her belly, and the slogan, “1 shot, 2 kills,” these, we are told again and again, are just some more bad apples.
We are told that the IDF commanders who ordered their troops to shoot at Palestinian and Red Cross paramedics, rescuers, and ambulances in Gaza, preventing evacuation and treatment of the wounded, resulting in the deaths of an unknown number of Palestinians, in another unequivocal breach of international law, are most likely just some bad apples. source
Barbaric Campaign Ever | Abby Martin
(May 14, 2021)
Palestinian and Israeli hostilities (May 15, 2021)
The highly structured layout of the classroom meant pupils were disconnected from one another and easily monitored, which again emphasized the atmosphere of distrust. Even the school bell, used to mark the end and the beginning of each period, can be easily recognized as a conditioning method, later described as such by Pavlov in the late 19th century.
The video is the work of:
Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin, who has done invaluable work in calling attention to the possibility that COVID-19 originated in a Wuhan lab, broke some news during his appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience on Tuesday.
After laying out the circumstantial evidence that COVID originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), Rogin explained why Dr. Anthony Fauci, like many in the world of virology research, has a vested professional interest in downplaying the likelihood that so-called gain-of-function research — of the kind performed at the Wuhan lab — not only failed to prevent the ongoing global pandemic but actually may have played a hand in unleashing it.
“The Godfather of [gain-of-function virology research], the head of the pyramid, is a guy you may have heard of called Anthony Fauci,” Rogin said. “So, Anthony Fauci, the hero of the pandemic, is the most important person in the world of gain-of-function research there is . . . Basically, he is the one disbursing all the grants for this, he is the one who pushed to turn it back on after Obama turned it off, that’s another crazy story, he turned it back on without really consulting the White House.”
“He consulted the Office of Science and Technology Policy, which is part of the White House, but the White House put a pause on it and he undid the pause,” Rogin continued. “The details are a little sketchy. I’m not saying he did anything necessarily wrong or illegal, but I’m saying that a lot of people that I know inside the Trump administration had no idea that he had turned this back on. He found a way to turn it back on in the mess of the Trump administration because the Trump administration is full of a bunch of clowns, so you could get things done if you knew how to work the system.”
As Rogin himself admits, “the details are a little sketchy,” and we’ll have to take a look at the sourcing included in whatever article this piece of news appears in before alleging any wrongdoing. But Rogin has banked significant credibility by questioning the mainstream COVID-origin consensus. He dealt a significant blow to the media’s near-religious faith in the natural-transmission theory by reporting on the existence of 2018 State Department cables that raised concerns about the lack of safety protocols at the Wuhan lab, which was performing gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses at the time.
An interview with Dr. Mullis – the scientist who invented PCR test.
In recent months an abundance of evidence has shown that the “gold standard” procedure for detecting COVID-19 is unreliable and could be producing untold numbers of false positives. If this is the case, why are health officials around the world calling for more tests? A discussion with Dr. Kary Mullis – Nobel Laureate, Chemistry – source
Amazon
Map showing the locations that are most likely to get hit in a full-scale nuclear exchange between the US and Russia, and areas likely to be affected by the fallout.
Based on the data from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Wikipedia.
DEFCON Level 5
The normal level of peacetime readiness, DEFCON 5 serves as the baseline for the military. This means that military training and operations continue as normal. Security operations resume with ID checks for all personnel entering any military base. This level of defense, like all others, remains until changed by the Department of Defense.
DEFCON Level 4
As the next level of severity, there are increased intelligence gathering and security measures. During DEFCON 4 there is an increase of personnel on guard during night and day, as well as random searches of vehicles coming onto base. There is also an increased number of personnel added to guard certain areas that would not be manned during level 5.
DEFCON Level 3
At this level in military readiness, The Air Force is ready to mobilize in 15 minutes. Base operations are changed significantly, with added security personnel. All Air Force essential personnel remain on base and are ready to mobilize and deploy. This condition also requires all military personnel to stay within fifty miles of their operating base. Commanders may order all their personnel to remain on base. DEFCON 3 corresponds to situations where there is a possibility of military action against the U. S. or our allies.
DEFCON Level 2
This level of severity is just below the maximum. An increase to level 2 is very serious, and all combat units must be ready to deploy within 6 hours. This condition carries a significant risk of major military operations against the United States or our allies.
DEFCON Level 1
As this is the most severe level of readiness, all military personnel are kept ready for immediate action. This means that open war is imminent. At this level, military personnel begin to deploy. There is a chance of the United States or our allies being targeted by nuclear weapons. The last time the military was at DEFCON 1 was during the Gulf War crisis.
German virologist and molecular biologist Dr. Stefan Lanka came to startling realizations when doing his own virus research as a University Student. (translated from German):
Viruses which are claimed to be very dangerous — in fact do not exist at all. The pictures of influenza, herpes, HIV, measles, hepatitis B, smallpox and other diseases are not pictures of viruses, but pictures of damaged cells with typical particles or other cellular material.
In Lanka’s words,
It must be said that these photos are an attempt of fraud committed by the researchers and medical scientists involved, as far as they assert that these structures are viruses or even isolated viruses.
Dr. Lanka discovered a virus in sea algae. It exists within the sea algae, lives in it, reproduces, and can leave the organisms. He found it didn’t cause it harm. Dr. Lanka believes there to be 100 million viruses of various kinds in about 4 cups of water. (Lanka does not believe that viruses exist in the animal kingdom as they are defined by Koch’s postulates.)
That glob colored pink is supposed to be the HIV virus. The photo’s are colored to make them more scary.
While I cannot say I know what that little glob is. It doesn’t look like an HIV virus. It looks like some tiny growth. Yet we are supposed to believe this is an HIV virus. Why? On faith alone.
The point here is that if this is fake. What about those other diseases supposed to be caused by viruses? What about the theory of vaccines?
The following statements by Dr. Derick Knauss on the identity of the virus and on the failures of the PCR test are corroborated by numerous scientific studies including the WHO. See the text by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky at the foot of Dr. Knauss’ article
***
I have a PhD in virology and immunology. I’m a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 “supposed” positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch’s postulates and observation under a SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples.
What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test.
We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples. We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious
.
The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died.
I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with. We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated and purifed sample of Covid 19. If they can’t or won’t send us a viable sample,
I say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious. The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs.
With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in any lab world wide has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That’s because they’ve never really found the virus, all they’ve ever found was small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway.
So what we’re dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19 does not exist and is fictitious. I believe China and the globalists orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a novel virus) to bring in global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this plot included massive election fraud to overthrow Trump.
Dr. Derek Knauss is a clinical lab specialist focusing on virology and immunology. He is based in Southern California. read from source
The Ukrainian government are bombing their own men, women and children, and with the full support of the US government, NATO, the EU and the UK. No ‘Press’ have been allowed to report from South Eastern Ukraine as the Ukrainian government have been detaining, expelling and shooting journalists. The European mainstream media is circulating propaganda and labeling the civilians in South-eastern Ukraine as ‘terrorists’. They are Grandfathers, Grandmothers, Fathers, Mothers, Brothers, Sisters, Aunties, Uncles and Children.
With astonishing unanimity, NATO leaders have feigned surprise at events they planned months in advance. Events that they deliberately triggered are being misrepresented as sudden, astonishing, unjustified “Russian aggression”. The United States and the European Union undertook this aggressive provocation in Ukraine and they knew this would force Russia to react defensively, one way or another. Crimeans voted for their ‘return’ to Russia in a referendum which was perfectly legal according to international law, although in violation of the Ukrainian constitution, which was by then in tatters having just been violated by the overthrow of the country’s duly elected president, Victor Yanukovych, facilitated by violent militias. goto petition site
Lessons learned from Dr. Djaballah about the COVID-19, caused by the SAR-CoV2 virus, can be summed up in several notes. Check out the video interview with Dr. Djaballah for more in depth. –
1 How much do we know about this virus?
2 Where far are we from developing a vaccine?
3 Who holds the key to understanding the nature of COVID-19?
4 The debate: Mask or no mask?
5 Why don’t we have a vaccine for SARS-CoV1 yet?
6 Can we stop the spread? How?
7 Lessons to learn from the COVID-19 outbreak.
You are no saint! ref: 31:00. There are no saints. Saints or saint-hood was created by Christians (the Catholic church). Just think for a minute, a saint is ordained by members of a club (males only). These same members who vote to ordain a saint are themselves not saints but are sinners and mortals. These individuals who are ordained may be advanced spirituals souls from their deeds, but the word “saint” is not a level recognized by the other side. The fact that the Catholics can ordain, is a perception of power which they gave to themselves. How can you vote for a soul to assure a level of status, a placeholder, for that soul within the spiritual realm? You can not be a saint no matter how pious and selfless you have been during your stay here on Earth unless you are a Christian or specifically a Catholic. In other words, saint hood is for Catholics.
Let me give an example of the flaw here. Mother Teresa was ordained (canonized) a saint, which involves a protocol the Church most undergo. As history records, according to the Catholic church, she worked among the poorest to make their life better and to provide a place where they could die in dignity. After she passed, Mother Teresa had such a legacy, several countries were fighting be able to enshrine her body where she either was born and lived. On the surface, her life is of a saint or saintly. However if you dig deeper, she was despicable and whole heartedly a loyalist for the Church at a GREAT expense and suffering of others. Instead of upgrading the lives of those who were in pain and suffering, she opt to send donations to the Italy instead. The majority of her effort was lining the coffers of the Church not helping others. source
[left, Why Mother Teresa Was Not A Saint/ Click to play] Research on: Mother Teresa Was No Saint. You would have to look that up yourselves. Be a contribution to yourself and the truth, look it up – do the work. I was stunned when I read this from different sources. If you would like to argue the point, I suggest instead of making yourself look foolish, that you first do some research.
– – – – – – – –
On September 4 of this year, Mother Teresa will become Saint Teresa. This is unsurprising; she was beatified in 2003, which is sort of a one-way road to canonization. But it’s the last thing we need. She was no saint.
To canonize Mother Teresa would be to seal the lid on her problematic legacy, which includes forced conversion, questionable relations with dictators, gross mismanagement, and actually, pretty bad medical care. Worst of all, she was the quintessential white person expending her charity on the third world — the entire reason for her public image, and the source of immeasurable scarring to the postcolonial psyche of India and its diaspora.
A 2013 study from the University of Ottawa dispelled the “myth of altruism and generosity” surrounding Mother Teresa, concluding that her hallowed image did not stand up to the facts, and was basically the result of a forceful media campaign from an ailing Catholic Church.
Although she had 517 missions in 100 countries at the time of her death, the study found that hardly anyone who came seeking medical care found it there. Doctors observed unhygienic, “even unfit,” conditions, inadequate food, and no painkillers — not for lack of funding, in which Mother Theresa’s world-famous order was swimming, but what the study authors call her “particular conception of suffering and death.”
“There is something beautiful in seeing the poor accept their lot, to suffer it like Christ’s Passion. The world gains much from their suffering,” Mother Teresa once told the unamused Christopher Hitchens.
Even within the bounds of Christian notions of blessed meekness, what kind of perverse logic underlies such thinking?
The answer, unsurprisingly, given the locale of her work, is racist colonialism. Despite the 100 countries’ missions, and her Albanian birthplace, Mother Teresa is of India and India begat Blessed Teresa of Calcutta. And there, she became what the historian Vijay Prashad dubbed “the quintessential image of the white woman in the colonies, working to save the dark bodies from their own temptations and failures. “
Her image is entirely circumscribed by colonial logic: that of the white savior shining a light on the world’s poorest brown people.
Mother Teresa was a martyr — not for India’s and the global South’s poor — but for white, bourgeois guilt. (As Prashad says, it functioned as this instead of, not on top of, a “genuine challenge to those forces that produce and maintain poverty.”)
And how did she even help said brown people? Dubiously if at all. She had a persistent “ulterior motive” to convert some of India’s most vulnerable and sick to Christianity, as the chief of a Hindu nationalist NGO said last year. There are even a number of accounts that she and her nuns tried to baptize the dying.
The cross-examination of the nun’s legacy would seem petty were it not for the Church’s breathless campaign to make her into something more.
This campaign started during her own life, when the anti-abortion British journalist Malcolm Muggeridge made Mother Teresa’s public image his singular cross to bear, first through a hagiographic 1969 documentary and then with a 1971 book. He set into motion a public resolve to situate her in the “realm of myth” rather than of history.
Her posthumous beatification was undertaken with the ardency of someone who doesn’t want to get caught. Pope John Paul II waived the normal five-year waiting period after her death for her beatification process to begin and launched it just a year after she died.
You would think that a woman who called for such extraordinary measures was singularly reproachless. Yet Mother Teresa hobnobbed, during her lifetime, with notorious despots like Haiti’s Jean-Claude Duvalier (from whom she accepted the Legion d’Honneur in 1981) and Albania’s Enver Hoxha.
Look, none of this is particularly new. Much of it surfaced in 2003, when she was beatified, and in Christopher Hitchens’s polemic, and in Tariq Ali’s documentary, “Hell’s Angel.” This is not to speak ill of the dead.
But Mother Teresa’s imminent sainthood is freshly infuriating. We make god in our image and we see holiness in those who resemble us. In this, Mother Teresa’s image is a relic of white, Western supremacy. Her glorification comes at the expense of the Indian psyche . And of a billion Indians and diaspora who were force-fed the notion that it’s different, and better, when white people help us. Who learned that forced conversion is no big deal. Who grew up learning the egregious fact that one of the five five “Indian” Nobel laureates was a woman who let sick people die. Poverty is not beautiful, it’s terrible. Mother Teresa will be the patron saint of white people on gap years, but not of any actual brown person.
In April 2020, I interviewed Judy Mikovits, Ph.D., about the potential role played by human gammaretroviruses in COVID-19. Mikovits is a molecular biologist1 and researcher, and was the founding research director of the Whittemore Peterson Institute in Nevada.
One of 3 Russian subs which surfaced. This was the only of the three which opened its silo door.
The establishment of the CIA as we know it did not appear overnight. It was the product of debates among military, state and defense leaders, with input from the public, thanks to key leaks that took the issue to the newspapers. Coming off of World War II (and the defeat of a totalitarian Nazi regime), many Americans feared our own government would become what we just had defeated.
Truman himself had similar concerns, but as the Cold War heated up, he became more open to its development. After much discussion and debate over structure, Truman finally signed the National Security Act in September 1947, which gave birth to the CIA. source
US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) has claimed that the Biden administration aims to force all Americans to have Covid-19 vaccine passports, comparing it to the “mark of the beast” prophesied in the Bible.
Plain and simple, a required passport (proof of current vaccines) would make it impossible to live in any city or town without the vaccine(s). You would be excluded from most anything. However the Western news outlets and the so called “Democrats” support the passport requirement.
Covid-19 masks are a crime against Humanity and child abuse. The following is a transcript of the highlights (by Henna Maria) from Dr. Margarite Griesz-Brisson’s recent extremely pressing video message, that was translated on-air from German into English by Claudia Stauber. Video at the end of the transcript.
Dr. Margarite Griesz-Brisson MD, PhD is a Consultant Neurologist and Neurophysiologist with a PhD in Pharmacology, with special interest in neurotoxicology, environmental medicine, neuroregeneration and neuroplasticity. This is what she has to say about masks and their effects on our brains:
The rebreathing of our exhaled air will without a doubt create oxygen deficiency and a flooding of carbon dioxide. We know that the human brain is very sensitive to oxygen deprivation. There are nerve cells for example in the hippocampus, that can’t be longer than 3 minutes without oxygen – they cannot survive. The acute warning symptoms are headaches, drowsiness, dizziness, issues in concentration, slowing down of the reaction time – reactions of the cognitive system.
However, when you have chronic oxygen deprivation, all of those symptoms disappear, because you get used to it. But your efficiency will remain impaired and the undersupply of oxygen in your brain continues to progress.
We know that neurodegenerative diseases take years to decades to develop. If today you forget your phone number, the breakdown in your brain would have already started 20 or 30 years ago.
While you’re thinking, that you have gotten used to wearing your mask and rebreathing your own exhaled air, the degenerative processes in your brain are getting amplified as your oxygen deprivation continues.
The second problem is that the nerve cells in your brain are unable to divide themselves normally. So in case our governments will generously allow as to get rid of the masks and go back to breathing oxygen freely again in a few months, the lost nerve cells will no longer be regenerated. What is gone is gone.
[..]I do not wear a mask, I need my brain to think. I want to have a clear head when I deal with my patients, and not be in a carbon dioxide induced anesthesia.
[..]There is no unfounded medical exemption from face masks because oxygen deprivation is dangerous for every single brain. It must be the free decision of every human being whether they want to wear a mask that is absolutely ineffective to protect themselves from a virus.
For children and adolescents, masks are an absolute no-no. Children and adolescents have an extremely active and adaptive immune system and they need a constant interaction with the microbiome of the Earth. Their brain is also incredibly active, as it is has so much to learn. The child’s brain, or the youth’s brain is thirsting for oxygen. The more metabolically active the organ is, the more oxygen it requires. In children and adolescents every organ is metabolically active.
To deprive a child’s or an adolescent’s brain from oxygen, or to restrict it in any way, is not only dangerous to their health, it is absolutely criminal. Oxygen deficiency inhibits the development of the brain, and the damage that has taken place as a result CANNOT be reversed.
Photo – Brain Damage from Lack of Oxygen
The child needs the brain to learn, and the brain needs oxygen to function. We don’t need a clinical study for that. This is simple, indisputable physiology. Conscious and purposely induced oxygen deficiency is an absolutely deliberate health hazard, and an absolute medical contraindication.
An absolute medical contraindication in medicine means that this drug, this therapy, this method or measure should not be used – is not allowed to be used. To coerce an entire population to use an absolute medical contraindication by force, there must be definite and serious reasons for this, and the reasons must be presented to competent interdisciplinary and independent bodies to be verified and authorized.
When in ten years, dementia is going to increase exponentially, and the younger generations couldn’t reach their god-given potential, it won’t help to say “we didn’t need the masks”.
[..]How can a veterinarian, a software distributer, a business man, an electrical car manufacturer and a physicist decided on matters regarding the health of the entire population? Please dear colleagues, we all have to wake up.
I know how damaging oxygen deprivation is for the brain, cardiologist knows it for the heart, the pulmonologist knows it for the lungs. Oxygen deprivation damages every single organ.
Where are our health departments, our health insurance, our medical associations? It would have been their duty to be vehemently against the lockdown and to stop it and stop it from the very beginning.
Why do the medical boards give punishments to doctors who give people exemptions? Does the person or the doctor seriously have to prove that oxygen deprivation harms people? What kind of medicine are our doctors and medical associations representing?
Who is responsible for this crime? The ones who want to enforce it? The ones who let it happen and play along, or the ones who don’t prevent it?[..]It’s not about masks, it’s not about viruses, it’s certainly not about your health. It is about much much more. I am not participating. I am not afraid.
[..]You can notice, they are already taking our air to breathe.
The imperative of the hour is personal responsibility.
We are responsible for what we think, not the media. We are responsible for what we do, not our superiors. We are responsible for our health, not the World Health Organization. And we are responsible for what happens in our country, not the government.” source
Brain Damage From Masks CANNOT BE REVERSED
March 26, 2021
From the #USA to #Ukraine, another batch of 35 Humvees arrived, as well as other military equipment with a total weight of 350 tons.
How much does a military humvee cost? $220,000 (2011) (up-armored) The former military workhorse, the Humvee, carried a $70,000 price tag. As that was modified, or “up-armored,” the cost rose to from $160,000 to $220,000.
The Pentagon’s next-generation Jeep carries a sticker of nearly $560,000.
The sobering price tag highlights the challenge of driving troops across the battlefield: you’ve got to be light enough to “git there furthest with the mostest,” as logistics officers like to say, while defending your human cargo from roadside bombs and other combat hazards.
In its latest balancing act between protecting and prevailing, the Army launched its newest generation of small troop movers Aug. 25. The Joint Light Tactical Vehicle—does the Army know how to come up with snappy nomenclature, or what?—is projected to end up costing $30.6 billion for 54,720 vehicles.
sources: time.com/4022300/the-legacy-of-ieds-the-500000-jeep/
Exhibit I:
There are essentially two broad categories of testing:
Antigen test (frequently referred to as a rapid test). This test detects protein fragments specific to the Coronavirus. It can be done in a clinic, doctor’s office, or hospital. Turnaround time for results is usually very quick and in some cases, results can be reported within 15 minutes.
PCR test. PCR testing is considered the “gold standard” in SARS-CoV-2 detection. This test actually detects RNA (or genetic material) that is specific to the virus and can detect the virus within days of infection, even those who have no symptoms. The test can be done in a clinic, hospital, or even in your car. Turnaround time is longer, generally in the 2-3 day range but results can be in as little as 24 hours. When demand is high, results can take a week or longer. source
Exhibit 2:
It has been reported that “LESS THAN ONE PERCENT” of adverse reactions are reported. That alone should give anyone serious pause! This is a reporting system that ANYBODY can submit adverse reactions to. Not just heath care professionals. wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D8;jsessionid=B36E488B4024366636BB25689240
On April 12, 1955 the government announced the first vaccine to protect kids against polio. Within days, labs had made thousands of lots of the vaccine. Batches made by one company, Cutter Labs, accidentally contained live polio virus and it caused an outbreak.
More than 200,000 children got the polio vaccine, but within days the government had to abandon the program.
The US just topped 6 million coronavirus cases in about 7 months. What happens next is up to you, Birx says”Forty thousand kids got polio. Some had low levels, a couple hundred were left with paralysis, and about 10 died,” said Dr. Howard Markel, a pediatrician, distinguished professor, and director of the Center for the History of Medicine at the University of Michigan. The government suspended the vaccination program until it could determine what went wrong.
Monkey Trouble
However, increased oversight failed to discover another problem with the polio vaccine. From 1955 to 1963, between 10% and 30% of polio vaccines were contaminated with simian virus 40 (SV40).
“The way they would grow the virus was on monkey tissues. These rhesus macaques were imported from India, tens of thousands of them,” medical anthropologist S. Lochlann Jain said. “They were gang caged and in those conditions, the ones that didn’t die on the journey, many got sick, and the viruses spread quickly,” added Jain, who taught a history of vaccines course at Stanford and is working on a publication about the incident. Scientists wrongly thought the formaldehyde they used would kill the virus. “It was being transferred to millions of Americans,” Jain said.
Experts call for independent commission separate from FDA to review Covid-19 vaccines
“Many believe this issue wasn’t adequately pursued,” Jain said. Some studies showed a possible link between the virus and cancer. The US Centers for Disease Control website, however, said most studies are “reassuring” and find no link. No current vaccines contain SV40 virus, the CDC says, and there’s no evidence the contamination harmed anyone.
The Epidemic That Never Was
In 1976, scientists predicted a pandemic of a new strain of influenza called swine flu. More than 40 years later, some historians call it “flu epidemic that never was.”
“President Ford was basically told by his advisers, that look, we have a pandemic flu coming called swine flu that may be as bad as Spanish flu,” said Michael Kinch, a professor of radiation oncology in the school of medicine at Washington University in St. Louis. His latest book, “Between Hope and Fear,” explores the history of vaccines.
What you need to know about coronavirus on Monday, August 31 “Ford was being cajoled to put forward a vaccine that was hastily put together. When you have a brand new strain situation like that, they had to do it on the fly,” Kinch said. Ford made the decision to make the immunization compulsory.
The government launched the program in about seven months and 40 million people got vaccinated against swine flu, according to the CDC. That vaccination campaign was later linked to cases of a neurological disorder called Guillain-Barre syndrome, which can develop after an infection or, rarely, after vaccination with a live vaccine.
Unfortunately, due to that vaccine, and the fact that it was done so hastily, there were a few hundred cases of Guillain-Barre, although it’s not definitive that they were linked,” Kinch said.
“Were only just beginning to learn how Covid-19 affects the brain” CDC said the increased risk was about 1 additional case of Gullain-Barre for every 100,000 people who got the swine flu vaccine. Due to this small association, the government stopped the program to investigate.”It was kind of a fiasco,” Markel said. “The good news is that there never was an epidemic of swine flu. So we were safe, but that shows you what could happen.”
It took several incidents for people to start distrusting vaccines. Even after thousands of kids got sick from the first polio vaccine in 1955, when the program restarted, parents made sure their children got vaccinated. They had clear memories of epidemics that paralyzed between 13,000 and 20,000 children every year. Some were so profoundly paralyzed that they could not even breathe easily on their own, and relied on machines called iron lungs to help them breathe.
“Parents were pushing their kids to get to the head of the line to get the polio vaccine, because they had seen epidemics every summer for years, and saw kids in iron lungs and they were terrified,” Markel said.”He signed up for a coronavirus vaccine trial using a method thats never been used in humans. He signed up for a coronavirus vaccine trial using a method that’s never been used in humans. Here’s why. Markel said people’s attitudes started to change between 1955 and the problematic 1976 swine flu vaccination project. “You’ve got civil rights, when people see the cops beating the hell out of people on TV. You’ve got the Vietnam War where people start to get disgusted with the killing. You’ve got Watergate when the president is literally lying through his teeth,” Markel said. “That led to a real distrust of authorities and federal government, and it extended to doctors and scientists. And, that’s only progressed as time has gone along.”
Trump claims ‘political reasons’ held up convalescent plasma emergency authorization
Markel said people’s mistrust of the system makes the idea that the FDA would rush this process before late stage clinical trials are complete”colossally stupid.”
“This is one of the most ridiculous things I’ve heard this administration say,” Markel said. “All it takes is one bad side effect to basically botch a vaccine program that we desperately need against this virus. It’s a prescription for disaster.”
FDA Commissioner Hahn said that the vaccine decision will be based on data, not politics, but Kinch shares Markel’s concern. “This could do substantial damage,” Kinch said. Kinch, who is a patient in one of the vaccine trials himself, said the clinical trial process needs to be followed to the end. A too-early EUA for a vaccine could cause a “nightmare scenario,” for a few reasons.
One, the vaccine may not be safe. Two, if it is not safe, people will lose faith in vaccines. Three, if a vaccine doesn’t offer complete protection, people will have a false sense of security and increase their risk. Four, if a substandard vaccine gets an EUA, a better vaccine may never get approval, because people would be reluctant to enroll in trials and risk getting a placebo instead of a vaccine.
“People are going to die unnecessarily if we take chances with this,” Kinch said. “We’ve got to get this right.”
CNN Health’s Jamie Gumbrecht contributed to this story source
![items.[0].image.alt](http://survivingintheusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/c2383baab2466fb3962d784926903ef3-1.png)
Baby food from several of the country’s largest manufacturers are “tainted” with toxic heavy metals, according to a disturbing new government report.The report, released Thursday morning, says those baby foods have “significant levels” of substances including lead, arsenic, cadmium and mercury. The metals can be especially dangerous to babies’ and toddlers’ brain development.
Parents often say they are looking for the healthiest, safest food for their babies. But as Connecticut mom Carrie Kerner found out, it’s difficult to look for something you may not even be aware of.
“I just looked for the ingredients,” Kerner told CBS News consumer investigative correspondent Anna Werner. “If there was any added preservatives, sweeteners or added sugars, I wouldn’t buy it, so I basically just wanted to get organic.”
Kerner had her first child, Chloe, a year ago. Ever since, she said she has been paying close attention to what is in Chloe’s food.
But one thing Kerner and her husband Bryan, who is a doctor, never worried about was whether the baby food contained toxic metals.
She said the revelation was “very concerning as a new mom.”
“That’s the least thing a mother wants to think about. You’re already worrying about her choking — about what goes into these foods,” Kerner said.
Yet a new congressional subcommittee investigation found major concerns over the presence of metals in baby food. The report says “baby foods are tainted with dangerous levels” of “toxic heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury.”
Researchers say that developing brains of babies and young children are “uniquely vulnerable” to toxic chemicals, which can cause “permanent brain injury.” Troubling risks include lowering IQ, problems in school and even criminal behavior later in life.
Illinois Democratic Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi told CBS News that getting heavy metals out of food sold for infants is critical.
“I don’t know a mom or dad that wants neurotoxins in their babies’ foods,” he said.
Investigators asked seven U.S. baby food manufacturers to provide internal documents and test results.
Of the four that did, all showed the presence of lead, arsenic and cadmium in their own test results — at levels the report says “eclipse” maximum levels set for other products.
Compared to the levels allowed by the FDA in bottled water, the report claimed, the results were “up to 91 times the arsenic level,” “up to 69 times the cadmium level,” and “up to 177 times the lead level.”
CBS News asked those companies for comment, and all who responded said they are committed to safety.
All the companies that responded also said they either comply with government standards, have developed their own internal quality and testing standards, or both. Several said they are part of the Baby Food Council, a group formed with the goal of voluntarily reducing heavy metals in baby foods.
The problem is not new, however — Consumer Reports did its own testing of 50 nationally-distributed baby foods in 2018, finding “every product had measurable levels of at least one” of three heavy metals, and 68% “had worrisome levels of at least one heavy metal.”
Consumer Reports’ James Dickerson says there’s not too much cause for alarm, since these heavy metals are naturally occurring.
“That’s the real big issue. You want to minimize the risk, you can’t eliminate it entirely, but you can minimize it. And there are steps that we can take,” Dickerson said.
He tells parents to limit rice and sweet potato products, which tend to absorb more pollutants because of the way they are grown. Dickerson also recommends avoiding snacks like crackers and puffs, which in Consumer Reports’ investigation had higher levels of heavy metals, and vary their child’s diet.
Congressman Krishnamoorthi believes that voluntary entry efforts are not enough. He plans to introduce legislation to step up FDA oversight.
“So now we need the FDA to step into the breach and do what I think the American people believe it is, is its job to do,” he said. “Which is to make sure that the food that their babies consume is safe.”
For worried parents wondering if they should throw out their baby food — experts say no, there is no need to panic if the products are in the pantry, and that the key is moderation.
When asked for a response, the FDA said it has been working on reducing exposure to toxic elements in foods, but acknowledges there is more work to be done.
According to Healthy Babies Bright Futures, a group dedicated to “measurably reduce the largest sources of babies’ exposures to toxic chemicals,” nearly nine out of ten baby foods tested had no enforceable federal safety limit for these heavy metals.
The FDA has been made aware of the report released today by the Subcommittee in Economic and Consumer Policy Committee on Oversight and Reform at the U.S House of Representatives and is reviewing its findings.
He said: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation.”
The Duke made the remarks when speaking to when speaking to German news agency Deutsche Press Agentur.
Prince Philip retired from all public duties in 2017, and now spends most of his time at Sandringham.
I work in the healthcare field. Here’s the problem, we are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases. This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply can not make accurate assessments.
This is why you’re hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. That’s because most Coronavirus strains are nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. The few actual novel Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues.
The ‘gold standard’ in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory isolated/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral isolation methods and controls (not the PCR that is currently being used or Serology /antibody tests which do not detect virus as such). PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.
But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways.
The problem is the test is known not to work.
It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.
Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.
The New Coronavirus Outbreak, COVID-19, Sounds Menacing and Is
The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.
And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load.
If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if it is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.
If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis.
And coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covid DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen
Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus.
They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive PCR test for covi even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common.
There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time.
All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease.
Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die. You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on.
Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist.
Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically.
Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people, you are mislabeling your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic.
1. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead.
2. You can tell people that ‘minimizing’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers.
3. You can talk crap about made up numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience.
4. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen.
Take these 4 simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks. They can not “confirm” something for which there is no accurate test. The original source of this article is Global Research.
Feb 15, 2021
The experts found the risks were so great that COVID-19 patients “may need to receive blood thinners, preventively, prophylactically,” even before imaging tests are ordered, said Bikdeli.
What exactly is causing it? The reasons aren’t fully understood, but he offered several possible explanations.
People with severe forms of COVID-19 often have underlying medical conditions like heart or lung disease — which are themselves linked to higher rates of clotting.
Next, being in intensive care makes a person likelier to develop a clot because they are staying still for so long. That’s why for example people are encouraged to stretch and move around on long haul flights. source
Feb 15, 2021 –
Around the world, a serious diagnostic error has been made in the fight against COVID-19. As Italian scientists have established, it turned out that the terrible disease is not pneumonia, and people die, to a greater extent, from diffuse venous thrombosis (thrombosis).
In this regard, the protocols for the treatment of coronavirus patients in Italy have been urgently changed. Along with antibiotics, antiviral and anti-inflammatory drugs, anticoagulants began to be used.
According to information from Italian pathologists, ventilators and intensive care units were unnecessary. As if to confirm the conclusions of the Italian doctors, an impressive case is documented in the United States, where an entire family was treated at home.
The treatment consisted of three 500 mg aspirin tablets dissolved in a hot drink made from warmed lemon juice and honey. The next morning the whole family woke up as if they had no symptoms!
Medical researcher from Italy: “Through 50 autopsies of COVID-19 deaths, pathologists have found that this is not exactly pneumonia, as the virus not only kills lung cells, but also provokes endothelial vascular thrombosis.
As with diffuse thrombosis in blood vessels, the lung is primarily affected because it is the most inflammatory, but there is also heart attack, stroke, and many other thromboembolic diseases. source
Several studies show adverse effects on living organisms induced by different types of human-made Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs). A study on insects (Chironomidae) focused on the DNA effects of giant chromosomes of the salivary glands of the animals with different frequencies (64.1–69.1, 67.2, 68.2 GHz). All frequencies, using power densities <6 mW/cm2, reduced the size of a particular area of the chromosome. This, in turn, led to the expression of specific secretory proteins of the salivary gland. Other studies suggest a variety of effects, the most important being DNA damage, which is linked to cancer, aging, neurodegenerative diseases, reproductive declines, genome instability, etc.
The biggest concern is how 5G will affect human skin. Our body has between two million to four million sweat ducts, which can act as an array of helical antennas when they are exposed to wavelengths, i.e., humans become more conductive. A recent New York study that experimented with 60GHz waves stated that the penetration depth analyses show that over 90% of the transmitted power is absorbed in the epidermis and dermis layers. This can lead to physical pain to the skin, skin diseases, and cancer.
A 1994 study found low-level millimeter microwave radiation produced lens opacity in rats, which is linked to cataracts production. The effects of MMW were also tested (60 GHz, 475 mW/cm2, 1.898 mW/cm2, 6, 30 min) on rabbit eyes, describing acute thermal injuries of various types. The higher temperature just below the eye surface could induce damage.
An experiment by the Medical Research Institute of Kanazawa Medical University discovered that 60GHz millimeter-wave antennas could cause thermal injuries of varying levels. The thermal effects caused by millimeter waves can penetrate below the surface of the eye. A 2003 Chinese study, meanwhile, has also found damage to the lens epithelial cells of rabbits after 8 hours of microwave radiation exposure.
A study conducted in Russia found that frequencies in the 53-78GHz range that 5G proposes to use impacted the heart rate variability, indicating stress in rats. Another Russian study on frogs, whose skin was exposed to MMWs, found noticeable heart rate changes (arrhythmias).
In 2002, Russian researchers examined the effects of 42HGz microwave radiation exposure on the blood of healthy mice. The study concluded that the exposure of healthy mice to low-intensity EHF EMR has a profound effect on the indices of nonspecific immunity. Another study, addressing the effects of MMW on the immune system of mice or rats, found an activation of the immune system at both the cellular and molecular levels.
A 2016 Armenian study suggested MMW’s effects are mainly on water, cell plasma membrane, and genome. They found that the contact between MMW and bacteria altered their susceptibility to various biologically active chemicals like antibiotics. Notably, the combination of MMW and antibiotics showed that it could lead to antibiotic resistance in bacteria.
An Armenian study in 2016 observed MMWs at low intensity, mirroring the future environment produced by 5G. It conducted on E-coli and other bacteria and stated that the waves depressed their growth, changing properties, and activity of the cells. The fear is that it will do the same for human cells.
Let’s sum up. Though there are plenty of studies on the potential impacts of 5G on human health, they are not clear-cut. Though there is no known mechanism for non-ionizing radiation to have a biological effect, it does not mean it is safe or that no effect exists. Indeed, researchers continue to conduct studies. But for now, everything we know about 5G networks tells us that there’s no reason to be alarmed.
Do pathogenic viruses (viruses with the ability to cause disease) exist? (source)
Dr Lanka was asked about pathogenic viruses such as HIV and did some research. He examined the scientific literature and discovered there was absolutely no evidence for the existence of any pathogenic virus deemed dangerous by the scientists and MDs; such as the mumps, measles, rubella and swine-flu viruses, and against which our children are vaccinated.
Now if pathogenic viruses exist, it should be possible to isolate them and measure their respective diameters.
This question is directed to Professor Bill Hall Director of the NVRL (National Virus Reference Laboratory), who is the most eminent expert in Ireland on pathogenic viruses:-
Rashid A. Buttar, DO, FAAPM, FACAM, FAAIM: Dr. Rashid A. Buttar received his undergraduate degree from Washington University in St. Louis with a double major in Biology and Theology at age 21, and then attended medical school at the University of Osteopathic Medicine and Health Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine and Surgery in Des Moines, Iowa, graduating with his medical degree at age 25. He trained in General Surgery and Emergency Medicine and served as Brigade Surgeon for 2nd Infantry Division, Republic of South Korea, and later as Chief of the Department of Emergency Medicine at Moncrief Army Community Hospital at Ft. Jackson in Columbia, South Carolina while serving in the US Army.
Kary Mullis, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology was awarded the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1993, The intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.
“How declaring virus pandemics based on PCR tests can end in disaster” was described by Gina Kolata in her 2007 New York Times article Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.
But instead of classifying the tests as unsuitable for SARS-CoV-2 detection and COVID-19 diagnosis, or instead of pointing out that only a virus, proven through isolation and purification, can be a solid gold standard, Watson claims in all seriousness that, “pragmatically” COVID-19 diagnosis itself, remarkably including PCR testing itself, “may be the best available ‘gold standard’.” But this is not scientifically sound. source
Here are ten messages that are essential pieces of the standard COVID narrative, but which are unfounded in actual science. Stay tuned for a detailed rebuttal of each.
1. “The origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was one of many random events in nature in which a virus jumps from one species to another.”
2.“Chloroquine kills patients and is too dangerous to use against COVID”
3.“The Ferguson model warned us of impending danger in time to take action and dodge a bullet.”
4.“American deaths from COVID: 200,000 and counting”
5.“New cases of COVID are expanding now in a dangerous Second Wave”
6.“Masks and social distancing are keeping the virus in check in our communities”
7.“Dr Fauci and the CDC are guiding our response to COVID according to the same principles of epidemic management that have protected public health in the past.
8.“Asymptomatic carriers are an important vector of disease transmission, which must be isolated if we are to stop the spread of COVID”
9.“The lower death rates now compared to April are due to protective measures such as social distancing, mask-wearing, and limited travel.”
10. “With enough resources, pharmaceutical scientists can develop a vaccine in a matter of months, and provide reasonable assurance that it is safe.”
This list of false claims pushed on us by a small clique is far from complete. The inducement of fear and panic is the primary strategy for getting people to go along with the imposition of such monumental changes in our lives.
| Parameter | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | Scenario 3 | Scenario 4 | Scenario 5: Current Best Estimate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R0* | 2.0 | 4.0 | 2.5 | ||
| Infection Fatality Ratio† | 0-19 years: 0.00002 20-49 years: 0.00007 50-69 years: 0.0025 70+ years: 0.028 |
0-19 years: 0.0001 20-49 years: 0.0003 50-69 years: 0.010 70+ years: 0.093 |
0-19 years: 0.00003 20-49 years: 0.0002 50-69 years: 0.005 70+ years: 0.054 |
||
| Percent of infections that are asymptomatic§ | 10% | 70% | 10% | 70% | 40% |
| Infectiousness of asymptomatic individuals relative to symptomatic¶ | 25% | 100% | 25% | 100% | 75% |
| Percentage of transmission occurring prior to symptom onset** | 30% | 70% | 30% | 70% | 50% |
Notes from Youtube video segment on: Waring mask:
Next is the Covet 19 and how they’re um, the lockdowns are not even related to each other. they are just one to enforce the other. So that is another level where these doctors and are coming forward and saying there is no justification for the mask and there is no justification for the lockdowns. So I ran into something very interesting which is it goes back and we discovered a report that actually goes back I think at least 10 different hospitals starting from the 1970s that an independent research on wearing mask and surgical mask in different surgeries and they found that actually the health of everyone involved and even the patient was higher not wearing the mask versus wearing the mask.
So that was stunning results and that goes back to the 1970s. So it is just how unbelievable how the requiring of mask is basically has nothing to do with the virus and that’s clearly coming forth in some of the information we’re seeing.
Central bank liquidity swap is a type of currency swap used by a country’s central bank to provide liquidity of its currency to another country’s central bank.[1][2] In a liquidity swap, the lending central bank uses its currency to buy the currency of another borrowing central bank at the market exchange rate, and agrees to sell the borrower’s currency back at a rate that reflects the interest accrued on the loan. source
In general, all of the following entities that have suffered substantial economic injury caused by a disaster provided they were in existence on January 31, 2020:
NOTE: EIDLs are now capped at $150,000. source go to the EIDL page
Receiving its annual foreign aid appropriation during the first month of the fiscal year, instead of in quarterly installments as do other recipients, is just another special privilege Congress has voted for Israel. It enables Israel to invest the money in U.S. Treasury notes. That means that the U.S., which has to borrow the money it gives to Israel, pays interest on the money it has granted to Israel in advance, while at the same time Israel is collecting interest on the money. That interest to Israel from advance payments adds another $1.650 billion to the total, making it $84,854,827,200.That’s the number you should write down for total aid to Israel. And that’s $14,346 each for each man, woman and child in Israel.
It’s worth noting that that figure does not include U.S. government loan guarantees to Israel, of which Israel has drawn $9.8 billion to date. They greatly reduce the interest rate the Israeli government pays on commercial loans, and they place additional burdens on U.S. taxpayers, especially if the Israeli government should default on any of them. But since neither the savings to Israel nor the costs to U.S. taxpayers can be accurately quantified, they are excluded from consideration here.
Further, friends of Israel never tire of saying that Israel has never defaulted on repayment of a U.S. government loan. It would be equally accurate to say Israel has never been required to repay a U.S. government loan. The truth of the matter is complex, and designed to be so by those who seek to conceal it from the U.S. taxpayer.
Most U.S. loans to Israel are forgiven, and many were made with the explicit understanding that they would be forgiven before Israel was required to repay them. By disguising as loans what in fact were grants, cooperating members of Congress exempted Israel from the U.S. oversight that would have accompanied grants. On other loans, Israel was expected to pay the interest and eventually to begin repaying the principal. But the so-called Cranston Amendment, which has been attached by Congress to every foreign aid appropriation since 1983, provides that economic aid to Israel will never dip below the amount Israel is required to pay on its outstanding loans. In short, whether U.S. aid is extended as grants or loans to Israel, it never returns to the Treasury. source
(CNN)During a campaign event in Nashua, New Hampshire on Tuesday, Democratic presidential frontrunner Joe Biden was asked about the 1994 crime bill he helped write as a Senator from Delaware. The question posed to Biden concerned the impact the bill had on mass incarceration rates, particularly among minority communities living in poverty, and what he might do to alleviate those effects.
“Folks, let’s get something straight,” Biden replied before defending the 1994 crime bill. “This idea that the crime bill generated mass incarceration—it did not generate mass incarceration.”
Facts first: Following passage of the 1994 crime bill, incarceration rates in the US continued to rise for more than a decade. Experts however say it’s hard to determine how much of this increase came as a result of the 1994 bill, since incarceration rates had been steadily rising since the early 1970s.
From 1973 to 2009, the incarceration rate in the US more than quadrupled, from 161 people to 767 per 100,000 nationwide, according to a study by the National Research Council. It’s hard to pin that trend on one particular piece of legislation. source
These irreverent acts are called, “The Depraved Indifference for Human Life”
The Hennepin County Medical Examiner says a preliminary autopsy found no evidence that George Floyd died of strangulation and traumatic asphyxia after former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin kneeled on his neck for more than 8 minutes.
The medical examiner said Floyd had underlying health conditions, including coronary artery disease and hypertensive heart disease.
“The combined effects of Mr. Floyd being restrained by the police, his underlying health conditions and any potential intoxicants in his system likely contributed to his death,” the medical examiner reported.
According to criminal complaint against Chauvin, who was charged with third degree murder and manslaughter on Friday, police were called to a grocery store after Floyd allegedly gave them a counterfeit $20 bill.
Minneapolis County District Attorney Mike Freeman said the investigation is ongoing involving the other three officers, saying, “We felt it appropriate to focus on the most dangerous perpetrator.”
The arrest comes after three days of protests, which escalated in violence as demonstrators torched a police precinct that had been abandoned by officers.
Your Content exclusively reported that President Trump had been briefed on the massive fire at the police department Thursday night, hinting he’d be sending ‘the cavalry’ in to assist. source
Here Are All the Companies Working on COVID-19 Vaccines, Treatments, and Testing
In the midst of a societal upheaval resulting from the novel coronavirus and the disease that it causes, COVID-19, there are many efforts in progress to find solutions to slow the spread of the disease and treat those who already have it. These efforts include those from governments, nonprofit organizations, and companies both privately held and publicly traded.
To help investors who desire to keep tabs on the publicly traded companies with COVID-19 programs, here are lists of all the companies with market caps of at least $200 million that are developing or have developed COVID-19 vaccines, treatments, and tests.
COVID-19 printed next to plastic balls resembling the coronavirus
IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.
Vaccines
Several companies already had vaccine platforms targeting other coronaviruses such as MERS and SARS. This enabled them to rapidly prototype experimental vaccines for immunizing against the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19. Following are all of the companies that are actively developing COVID-19 vaccines either on their own or in partnership with another drugmaker.
Company
Market Cap
Arcturus Therapeutics (NASDAQ:ARCT) $249.1 million
BioNTech (NASDAQ:BNTX) $12.2 billion
CSL Behring (OTC:CSLLY) $89.8 billion
Dynavax (NASDAQ:DVAX) $293.9 million
GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE:GSK) $93.7 billion
Inovio Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:INO) $1.2 billion
Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) $357.9 billion
Moderna (NASDAQ:MRNA) $11.4 billion
Novavax (NASDAQ:NVAX) $821.8 million
Pfizer (NYSE:PFE) $190.2 billion
Sanofi (NASDAQ:SNY) $112.9 billion
TranslateBio (NASDAQ:TBIO) $614.1 million
DATA SOURCES: BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATION, COMPANY PRESS RELEASES, YAHOO! FINANCE.
Two of these companies appear to be in the lead right now. In March, Moderna initiated the first clinical testing in humans of an experimental COVID-19 vaccine. The biotech’s messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine was developed in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Inovio announced on April 6 that it had begun a phase 1 clinical study of experimental COVID-19 DNA vaccine INO-4800.
Treatments
Several companies already have approved products on the market that could hold potential in treating patients with COVID-19. Others have experimental drugs that have been included in testing for other viruses that could be effective in targeting novel coronavirus infection. Some are scrambling to develop new therapies for COVID-19. Following are the companies that are developing or testing potential COVID-19 therapies.
Company
Market Cap
AbbVie (NYSE:ABBV) $113.7 billion
Adaptive Biotechnologies (NASDAQ:ADPT) $3.4 billion
Alexion Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ALXN) $21.7 billion
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ALNY) $12.6 billion
Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN) $122.9 billion
Bayer (OTC:BAYRY) $60.2 billion
Biogen (NASDAQ:BIIB) $54.1 billion
CSL Behring $89.8 billion
CytoDyn (NASDAQOTH:CYDY) $1.3 billion
Emergent BioSolutions (NYSE:EBS) $3.1 billion
Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:GILD) $96.6 billion
Grifols (NASDAQ:GRFS) $19.5 billion
Incyte (NASDAQ:INCY) $18 billion
Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) $135.8 billion
Mesoblast (NASDAQ:MESO) $6.1 billion
Novartis (NYSE:NVS) $193.1 billion
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:REGN) $55.5 billion
Roche Holding (OTC:RHHBY) $286.7 billion
Sanofi $112.9 billion
Takeda Pharmaceutical (NYSE:TAK) $47.6 billion
Vanda Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:VNDA) $568.7 million
Vir Biotechnology (NASDAQ:VIR) $3.9 billion
DATA SOURCES: BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATION, COMPANY PRESS RELEASES, YAHOO! FINANCE.
Three drugs with the potential to treat COVID-19 have received the most public attention. Gilead’s remdesivir, which was originally developed to treat the Ebola virus, is in late-stage clinical studies and could be the most promising treatment, according to World Health Organization Assistant Director-General Bruce Aylward. President Trump has spoken frequently about his view that anti-malaria drugs chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, which are marketed by companies including Sanofi, could be effective in treating COVID-19, although health officials have stressed that the efficacy of the drugs in treating COVID-19 remains unproven at this point.
source: https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/04/07/here-are-all-the-companies-working-on-covid-19-vac.aspx
Herd immunity is a form of indirect protection from infectious disease that occurs when a large percentage of a population has become immune to an infection, whether through vaccination or previous infections, thereby providing a measure of protection for individuals who are not immune.Wikipedia
Contact tracing is a little like detective work: Trained staff interview people who have been diagnosed with a contagious disease to figure out who they may have recently been in contact with. Then, they go tell those people they may have been exposed, sometimes encouraging them to quarantine themselves to prevent spreading the disease any further. Think of it as part public health work, and part investigation.
The technique is a “cornerstone” of preventative medicine, says Dr. Laura Breeher, medical director of occupational health services at the Mayo Clinic. “Contact tracing, it’s having a moment of glory right now with COVID because of the crucial importance of identifying those individuals who have been exposed quickly and isolating or quarantining them,” she says.
Contact tracing was used during the 2014 Ebola virus outbreak, as well as in the SARS outbreak in 2003. It’s also used to combat sexually transmitted infections and other communicable diseases like tuberculosis. And as COVID-19 has gone global, countries like South Korea and New Zealand have aggressively used contact tracing in an attempt to control outbreaks.
Keep up to date with our daily coronavirus newsletter by clicking here.
How does contact tracing work?
Once someone has been confirmed to be infected with a virus, such as through a positive COVID-19 test, contact tracers try to track down others who have had recent prolonged exposure to that person when they may have been infectious. Typically, that exposure means being within 6 feet of the person for more than 10 minutes, says Dr. Breeher, though in a health care setting, such as a hospital, the bar is lowered to five minutes.
Healthcare workers then make an effort to reach out to every one of those contacts, tell them that they may have been exposed, and giving them instructions on what to do next. That may include telling them about possible symptoms or directing them to self-isolate.
What are the limitations of contact tracing?
For one, contact tracing is a laborious process. Interviewing infectious patients and reaching out to dozens of contacts takes time. For that reason, contact tracing works best when there are low levels of infection in a community, says Dr. Frank Esper, a pediatric infectious disease specialist at the Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital. “When you get to a point where there is a lot of people who are sickened with a particular disease, it quickly overwhelms the health departments’ response to be able to contact trace all those individuals,” he says. source: https://time.com/5825140/what-is-contact-tracing-coronavirus/
May 14, 2020 – Family practice physician from Newport Beach, California named Dr. Jeff Barke was recently filmed speaking out against the state’s COVID-19 regulations. What if quarantining the healthy doesn’t actually save lives? Attending a Riverside, California demonstration calling for the Golden State to allow businesses to reopen, Dr. Barke said he was representing 
thousands of physicians around the country who are being silenced for opposing the mainstream narrative surrounding coronavirus safety measures. “What if the experts are wrong?” Dr. Barke asked to begin his speech. “What if quarantining the healthy doesn’t actually save lives? What if wearing a mask in public is not effective?” “My name is Dr. Jeff Barke and I’m here representing thousands of physicians across the country whose voices are being silenced because we don’t agree with the mainstream media and the experts who are telling us what to do,” he continued. “Never in the history of this great republic have we quarantined the healthy. Never in the history of this great republic did we tell churchgoers that it’s illegal for you to exercise your First Amendment right of freedom of religion yet at the same time it’s essential to keep pot dispensaries open.” Dr. Barke also pointed out the hypocrisy of the state declaring churches non-essential, but claiming abortions are essential as well as not allowing citizens to purchase firearms while freeing violent criminals from jail. “As we see the statistics come in, we’re realizing that the fatality rate of this virus is in the ballpark of a bad seasonal influenza,” he stated. “What we’re also knowing is that just like other respiratory viral illnesses in the past, we get over this virus by achieving herd immunity. We can never achieve herd immunity by keeping the herd quarantined.” Calling for the state to open its economy back up, Dr. Barke declared, “It’s time we protect the vulnerable and most at risk, but we allow the young and healthy to open the doors and get back to work!” Dr. Barke joins thousands of other physicians, including a pair of doctors from Bakersfield, California who went viral online for speaking out against California’s stay-at-home order.
May 14, 2020 – American Cattle Rancher Shad Sullivan has a virtual sit down with Patrick Bet-David to talk about the future of cattle and meat industry. Visit Label Our Beef site bit.ly/2L8clQP About the Guest: Shad Sullivan is the R-CALF USA Private Property Rights Committee Chair. Sullivan is a fifth generation native to southeast, Colorado. Raised in the family stocker operation on Antelope Mesa in northwestern Crowley County, Shad learned early on the importance of hard work, dedication, loyalty and integrity. He is a graduate of Crowley County High school and earned his Bachelor of Science Degree in Agriculture/Animal Science from West Texas A&M University in 1996. After a short stint instructing and coaching equine evaluation at Clarendon College, Shad returned to the family ranching operation to help perpetuate family tradition of land stewardship and beef production. His greatest love is watching the cattle grow.
https://tips2fix.com/police-officer-c… Police Officer Compelled To Speak Out Against Tyrannical Enforcement Cop’s Urgent Appeal To Tyrant Police: “What Are You, The Gestapo?!” You need to stand for what is right! GoFundMe for him and his family: https://mrgunsngear.org/2SYFdPP This Video Source Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/tv/B_0t-MLJ… Are you doing the right thing? 👮♀️ Many officers out there are trampling on people’s liberties. Ask yourself are you doing the right thing?
Read full speech here : https://tips2fix.com/police-officer-c… Visit tips2fix.com website for more videos like this.
A new mandate in Huston, would fine residents $1,000 for not wearing a mask in public.Huston’s police union president is calling the measure, draconian.
In Michigan state law makers trying to restrain the governor’s emergency powers after the governor issued wide-spread bans. Even prohibiting members of the same family from visiting each other.
Trey Gowdy: 
The greater the freedom you infringe, the more compelling the reason has to be. If I am going to imprison or fine you, then why can I not hold you down and vaccinate you against the flew this fall? You do not want the flue and Covid19 so can I involuntary vaccinate you, can I show up to your house and make sure you are doing you burpees your planks and jumping jacks because obesity and the covid19 don’t go well together? Where does it stop?
